I said noooo noooo nooooTrue or False: A link is a pointer to a document somewhere on the Web?
it's false because the link can be a picture witch is not a document
and the file can be on your computer witch is not the web
A link is a pointer on a fileTrue or False: A link is a pointer to a document somewhere on the Web?
technically this is false
Friday, February 12, 2010
(5x+2)+0=5x+2 is it true or false and what property?
?(5x+2)+0=5x+2 is it true or false and what property?
it is called the zero property, or Identity Property...and yes that is true
The Zero property means that adding 0 to any number leaves you with the number. (ex: 0 + 5 = 5)
Also, the problem with the other answer: Associative property has nothing to do with adding 0, it means that if you reverse the order of added numbers, you get the same answer...so 3+5 is the same as 5+3, which has nothing to do with what you're asking :o)(5x+2)+0=5x+2 is it true or false and what property?
It is true. It is called the additive identity, or identitive property of addition, which says that if you add zero to any quantity, the sum will be the original quantity itself. 鈾?br>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_id鈥?/a>
I think it's the associative property (it states that it doesn't matter which numbers associate with each other)
True. Associative.
true, additive identity property
it is called the zero property, or Identity Property...and yes that is true
The Zero property means that adding 0 to any number leaves you with the number. (ex: 0 + 5 = 5)
Also, the problem with the other answer: Associative property has nothing to do with adding 0, it means that if you reverse the order of added numbers, you get the same answer...so 3+5 is the same as 5+3, which has nothing to do with what you're asking :o)(5x+2)+0=5x+2 is it true or false and what property?
It is true. It is called the additive identity, or identitive property of addition, which says that if you add zero to any quantity, the sum will be the original quantity itself. 鈾?br>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_id鈥?/a>
I think it's the associative property (it states that it doesn't matter which numbers associate with each other)
True. Associative.
true, additive identity property
True or False: Beverly Hills Cop 1,2,3 was the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER?
Killer soundtrack, Killer Action scenes, Killer Dialogue. AND it was profoundly meaningful. What more could you ask for?.
Professional opinions only please.True or False: Beverly Hills Cop 1,2,3 was the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER?
False, Any movie that starts off with Debbie Does and has squeals is the greatest Trilogy Ever.True or False: Beverly Hills Cop 1,2,3 was the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER?
false
False. I liked them but there's others I prefer, the Matrix, Star Wars, or Terminator trilogies are superior
oh yes it was great do you know I just rewatched 3 this past week end...love the shows all of them
you aint gonna shoot me, i can see it in your eyes
you got lyin eyes!!
Well, I doubt my opinion counts as ';professional'; but I wouldn't call it the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER.
false
i love beverley hills cop trilogy, but in opinion the star wars trilogy was the best trilogy ever.Cats
Professional opinions only please.True or False: Beverly Hills Cop 1,2,3 was the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER?
False, Any movie that starts off with Debbie Does and has squeals is the greatest Trilogy Ever.True or False: Beverly Hills Cop 1,2,3 was the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER?
false
False. I liked them but there's others I prefer, the Matrix, Star Wars, or Terminator trilogies are superior
oh yes it was great do you know I just rewatched 3 this past week end...love the shows all of them
you aint gonna shoot me, i can see it in your eyes
you got lyin eyes!!
Well, I doubt my opinion counts as ';professional'; but I wouldn't call it the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER.
false
i love beverley hills cop trilogy, but in opinion the star wars trilogy was the best trilogy ever.
True or False. Similar figures have the same shape and angle measyres but not necessarily the same length side?
TrueTrue or False. Similar figures have the same shape and angle measyres but not necessarily the same length side?
True. That's what it means to be ';Similar';.
True. That's what it means to be ';Similar';.
TRUE OR FALSE: in the 1780s, states had their own constitutions, many with their own bill of rights?
yes and they still do today.TRUE OR FALSE: in the 1780s, states had their own constitutions, many with their own bill of rights?
False. The United States were formed in 1776 This instilled a unionized group of laws superseding States Rights four years before your date.
False. The United States were formed in 1776 This instilled a unionized group of laws superseding States Rights four years before your date.
True Or False?? How can you love somebody when you dont love yourself? explain this one please?
I think it's true. I see people all the time that obviously don't love themselves but are married and seem to be in love.True Or False?? How can you love somebody when you dont love yourself? explain this one please?
You can't.
You must first place a value of worth on oneself to give a value to the love you offer to another.
If one expects to give oneself to another there should always be something there to help build a relatiuonship on.
Worthless is not a credit but actually a debit when it comes to love.True Or False?? How can you love somebody when you dont love yourself? explain this one please?
true... if you cant find something in yourself to love then how can someone else... and if they do how can they stay with you if u dont want urslf does this make sense... it does in my head... i have a record for bad explainations... but i have the explaination
I believe it's false
Because the reason someone wouldn't love themself is because they can't find anything in themself to love, though if they find something in someone else that they love, then they can love that person
Because people are different from each other. Just because you don't love yourself, that doesn't stop you from loving others.
False.
Sometimes, when you don't love yourself, you need someone to love you and point out how amazing you really are.
false you can hate yourself for loving someone else
I have never loved myself. But I am capable of loving others. I always have been. Animals are the easiest to love, tho.
being unable to forgive yourself
True, if you can't love yourself then how in the world can you love anyone else.
False, no one doesn't love him/herself unless he/she has mental disorder...z
False, I LOVE myself, but I hate that dumb b@stard Jon!!
You can't.
You must first place a value of worth on oneself to give a value to the love you offer to another.
If one expects to give oneself to another there should always be something there to help build a relatiuonship on.
Worthless is not a credit but actually a debit when it comes to love.True Or False?? How can you love somebody when you dont love yourself? explain this one please?
true... if you cant find something in yourself to love then how can someone else... and if they do how can they stay with you if u dont want urslf does this make sense... it does in my head... i have a record for bad explainations... but i have the explaination
I believe it's false
Because the reason someone wouldn't love themself is because they can't find anything in themself to love, though if they find something in someone else that they love, then they can love that person
Because people are different from each other. Just because you don't love yourself, that doesn't stop you from loving others.
False.
Sometimes, when you don't love yourself, you need someone to love you and point out how amazing you really are.
false you can hate yourself for loving someone else
I have never loved myself. But I am capable of loving others. I always have been. Animals are the easiest to love, tho.
being unable to forgive yourself
True, if you can't love yourself then how in the world can you love anyone else.
False, no one doesn't love him/herself unless he/she has mental disorder...z
False, I LOVE myself, but I hate that dumb b@stard Jon!!
True or false: Most poor people are ';lazy'; and most wealthy people are ';hard-working';?
False. The Neo Cons like to make glittering generalization. The poor work for the rich, but the rich don't work too hard because most of their wealth is inherited and not earned.True or false: Most poor people are ';lazy'; and most wealthy people are ';hard-working';?
I guess people like you, Rosen, like to make glittering lies. Most millionaires did not inherit their wealth. Why don't you tell us where you got that information? Follow this link for some real information.
http://www.nytimes.com/books/f鈥?/a>
True or false: Most poor people are ';lazy'; and most wealthy people are ';hard-working';?
Not necessarily true.
What is true, is that people who are paid less offer less valued services. People who are paid more offer more highly valued services.
Poor can be very hard working in manual labor, and rich can be very lazy in a desk job. However, someone who labors all day gathering potatoes in the sun are only dealing with potatoes. Someone in a easy desk job, whos labor might consist of 10 seconds of thought and the manual labor of a pen stroke, may be dealing with a $10 billion transaction.
I may go out on a limb and say the poor who are struggling to do what is right, and earn a living, very well may be working the hardest. They may not be the brightest, no degree, maybe not even a GED, but they know they must provide for a family, so they take any hard job they can get to put food on the table.
I will agree that most rich people are very hard working (that does not include the trust fund babies that inherit their wealth form daddy).
But as to poor people most work very hard. I mean very hard work and very long back braking hours. They do not have the education or will power to ';use'; money properly to create wealth.
Beyond that there are lazy people that are naturally poor because of that trait. But drugs and other additions keep a lot of people poor.
Bye the way - it is not my fault and I should not be forced to pay for their additions!
Hard working people whose jobs provides them with food, shelter, simple pleasures in life, close family %26amp; friends, some advantages for their children, faith in God may not have a lot of money or luxuries but they are happy, content because their values are focused on the things that are the most gratifying in life. By the wealthy's standards they may be not have a lot of luxuries to leave when they die but they by no means feel poor.
The most poor are those whose greed for power, prestige, keeping up with the Jones's, envy to accumulate more stuff, whose life revolves around making money for more 'things' of no lasting value are the most miserable because greed knows no limit.
The lazy are poor because they are uneducated by choice, will do nothing to take advantage of the opportunities life offers them and have been born into a system whose morality, faith in God %26amp; themselves have failed. Those who believe they are entitled through others hard work and sacrifice and taxes to continue to live an irresponsible lifestyle provided by the government. Those who continue to bring children into the world with no thought of how they will support them, thus, teach them to believe the government and others owe them a living and grow up full of hate and resentment. When the government entitlements can't satisfy them they become dangerous and turn to crime. Unfortunately, the cycle continues as long as liberals can get votes to stay in Congress or high positions where they themselves become multimillionaires.
Greed knows no bounds and fosters corruption %26amp; inevitably misery.
That's a loaded question if ever there was one. Most poor people are born into circumstances in which they will not be able to survive due to poor nutrition and lack of clean water in many MANY places in this world. The industrialists and their accomplices have helped to ensure that that happens by displacing them through various means, either by force or otherwise. In the U.S. one only has to refer back to when Native Americans lived in harmony with the natural world until their culture was virtually wiped out and now many of them are poor and living on reservations.
The 'hard working' industrialists lack empathy and remorse. For those industrialists who have a any sort of conscience, they assuage the slightest amount of guilt they may be experiencing by funding charities and 'giving back to the community' (they sure as hell ought to). Generally, they take what they can when can and your ambitiousness and 'hard work' is what they want out of you in order for them to achieve more wealth. When your home ends up in foreclosure, your job outsourced, and your health insurance premiums go higher and higher and you are bankrupt, then you can thank those at the very top for helping you to get there. How's that for being 'hard working'?
Of course many successful people are intelligent and hard working.
This seems to break down, however, with the super wealthy - I've known a few and they are without exception dullards, people who grew up with money and used their family's contacts and/or Ivy League school contacts to get jobs they in no way deserved.
And had a shocking sense of entitlement and lack of ethics that allowed them to manipulate and exploit the system.
false. Rich people get maid service and poor people do their own work. Rich people live off the grease of the working class while they sit on their butts and have everyone else do everything for them. Most were born into wealth and had easy access to become successful while the poor person has to work their a$$es off and still only receive the crumbs from the rich man's table.
I think there is no correct answer to such a broad question. People are lazy, people are hardworking. Too many variables in a vas vantage point unique to each.
Those who do not put in the hard work for success, probably will not achieve it. But on the other hand, it's like this. I was plant superintendent for a cabinet shop years ago. We all worked very hard. Due to the effects of the economy, regardless of our hard work the company in the end did not succeed thus we didn't get rich.
Then you must weigh what wealth means to each individual. Many believe true wealth is not measured by the amount of money one has, but the number of people one can truly call a friend.
I know you and I have different political views, but that's okay. It's what America is about. I do think you are intelligent, with much to offer to the debate. Politics aside, if we were to meet in person, I am sure we would get along just fine.
I do wish you well, and a successful life what ever that means to you.
People who want something for nothing ARE lazy....Listen, if people were screaming for the opportunity to earn %26amp; buy what they wanted I would be all for it and support them at every turn...the fact that most people now want government to hand out items at the cost of ';rich people'; is disturbing. Yep...those types are lazy as f*** all.
People should befighting for their right to be rich themselves instead of fighting over scraggings from a rich man's table.
if someone says that poor people are lazy you should slap them. i dont know how it is where you are but here in Australia if you have no money or identification you cant get a home, if you dont have a home you cant bath and sleep comfortably, if you dont bath you cant get a job and without a job how can you get identification? and it doesnt help that half of the homeless are mentally ill.
so false
Actually, what peer-reviewed science shows is that most poor people are stupid and most wealthy people are intelligent. I'm not joking; the correlation is very strong. Look it up.
Why do libs seem to always insist that criminals are victims, lazy people are oppressed, and hard-working people are undeserving?
Not True, Meaning They are Poor Because they Work Hard But they don't earn enough Money and that's a Shame, and Rich People Some Just Act Wild and Spend Spend Spend Money they sure Didn't Earn Paris Hilton and Britney Spears' Ex K FED just a Couple of Examples.
It's probably a mixed answer--not either/OR.
It's pretty clear that lazy people are likely to be poor, and ambitious people have a better chance for success.
Wouldn't even a Lefty agree with that?
Probably not most. However, I don't know anyone who is poor and hard-working unless they made very bad decisions in their lifetime.
False, however you don't make any significant money by sitting on your rear, collecting welfare. Hard work equals more money through Capitalism, which is the only fair system.
false..
a persons financial status is not necessarily a direct reflection of their ability or desire to work.
Many rich people come from rich families and are given a leg up.So no the argument that poor people are lazier is not true on the whole.
Could not be further from the truth.
i would say poor people are either lazy or dumb or sick, but they aren't none of them.
false. But there are wealthy people that worked har to get their fortune.
FALSE.
FLASE
I guess people like you, Rosen, like to make glittering lies. Most millionaires did not inherit their wealth. Why don't you tell us where you got that information? Follow this link for some real information.
http://www.nytimes.com/books/f鈥?/a>
Report Abuse
True or false: Most poor people are ';lazy'; and most wealthy people are ';hard-working';?
Not necessarily true.
What is true, is that people who are paid less offer less valued services. People who are paid more offer more highly valued services.
Poor can be very hard working in manual labor, and rich can be very lazy in a desk job. However, someone who labors all day gathering potatoes in the sun are only dealing with potatoes. Someone in a easy desk job, whos labor might consist of 10 seconds of thought and the manual labor of a pen stroke, may be dealing with a $10 billion transaction.
I may go out on a limb and say the poor who are struggling to do what is right, and earn a living, very well may be working the hardest. They may not be the brightest, no degree, maybe not even a GED, but they know they must provide for a family, so they take any hard job they can get to put food on the table.
I will agree that most rich people are very hard working (that does not include the trust fund babies that inherit their wealth form daddy).
But as to poor people most work very hard. I mean very hard work and very long back braking hours. They do not have the education or will power to ';use'; money properly to create wealth.
Beyond that there are lazy people that are naturally poor because of that trait. But drugs and other additions keep a lot of people poor.
Bye the way - it is not my fault and I should not be forced to pay for their additions!
Hard working people whose jobs provides them with food, shelter, simple pleasures in life, close family %26amp; friends, some advantages for their children, faith in God may not have a lot of money or luxuries but they are happy, content because their values are focused on the things that are the most gratifying in life. By the wealthy's standards they may be not have a lot of luxuries to leave when they die but they by no means feel poor.
The most poor are those whose greed for power, prestige, keeping up with the Jones's, envy to accumulate more stuff, whose life revolves around making money for more 'things' of no lasting value are the most miserable because greed knows no limit.
The lazy are poor because they are uneducated by choice, will do nothing to take advantage of the opportunities life offers them and have been born into a system whose morality, faith in God %26amp; themselves have failed. Those who believe they are entitled through others hard work and sacrifice and taxes to continue to live an irresponsible lifestyle provided by the government. Those who continue to bring children into the world with no thought of how they will support them, thus, teach them to believe the government and others owe them a living and grow up full of hate and resentment. When the government entitlements can't satisfy them they become dangerous and turn to crime. Unfortunately, the cycle continues as long as liberals can get votes to stay in Congress or high positions where they themselves become multimillionaires.
Greed knows no bounds and fosters corruption %26amp; inevitably misery.
That's a loaded question if ever there was one. Most poor people are born into circumstances in which they will not be able to survive due to poor nutrition and lack of clean water in many MANY places in this world. The industrialists and their accomplices have helped to ensure that that happens by displacing them through various means, either by force or otherwise. In the U.S. one only has to refer back to when Native Americans lived in harmony with the natural world until their culture was virtually wiped out and now many of them are poor and living on reservations.
The 'hard working' industrialists lack empathy and remorse. For those industrialists who have a any sort of conscience, they assuage the slightest amount of guilt they may be experiencing by funding charities and 'giving back to the community' (they sure as hell ought to). Generally, they take what they can when can and your ambitiousness and 'hard work' is what they want out of you in order for them to achieve more wealth. When your home ends up in foreclosure, your job outsourced, and your health insurance premiums go higher and higher and you are bankrupt, then you can thank those at the very top for helping you to get there. How's that for being 'hard working'?
Of course many successful people are intelligent and hard working.
This seems to break down, however, with the super wealthy - I've known a few and they are without exception dullards, people who grew up with money and used their family's contacts and/or Ivy League school contacts to get jobs they in no way deserved.
And had a shocking sense of entitlement and lack of ethics that allowed them to manipulate and exploit the system.
false. Rich people get maid service and poor people do their own work. Rich people live off the grease of the working class while they sit on their butts and have everyone else do everything for them. Most were born into wealth and had easy access to become successful while the poor person has to work their a$$es off and still only receive the crumbs from the rich man's table.
I think there is no correct answer to such a broad question. People are lazy, people are hardworking. Too many variables in a vas vantage point unique to each.
Those who do not put in the hard work for success, probably will not achieve it. But on the other hand, it's like this. I was plant superintendent for a cabinet shop years ago. We all worked very hard. Due to the effects of the economy, regardless of our hard work the company in the end did not succeed thus we didn't get rich.
Then you must weigh what wealth means to each individual. Many believe true wealth is not measured by the amount of money one has, but the number of people one can truly call a friend.
I know you and I have different political views, but that's okay. It's what America is about. I do think you are intelligent, with much to offer to the debate. Politics aside, if we were to meet in person, I am sure we would get along just fine.
I do wish you well, and a successful life what ever that means to you.
People who want something for nothing ARE lazy....Listen, if people were screaming for the opportunity to earn %26amp; buy what they wanted I would be all for it and support them at every turn...the fact that most people now want government to hand out items at the cost of ';rich people'; is disturbing. Yep...those types are lazy as f*** all.
People should befighting for their right to be rich themselves instead of fighting over scraggings from a rich man's table.
if someone says that poor people are lazy you should slap them. i dont know how it is where you are but here in Australia if you have no money or identification you cant get a home, if you dont have a home you cant bath and sleep comfortably, if you dont bath you cant get a job and without a job how can you get identification? and it doesnt help that half of the homeless are mentally ill.
so false
Actually, what peer-reviewed science shows is that most poor people are stupid and most wealthy people are intelligent. I'm not joking; the correlation is very strong. Look it up.
Why do libs seem to always insist that criminals are victims, lazy people are oppressed, and hard-working people are undeserving?
Not True, Meaning They are Poor Because they Work Hard But they don't earn enough Money and that's a Shame, and Rich People Some Just Act Wild and Spend Spend Spend Money they sure Didn't Earn Paris Hilton and Britney Spears' Ex K FED just a Couple of Examples.
It's probably a mixed answer--not either/OR.
It's pretty clear that lazy people are likely to be poor, and ambitious people have a better chance for success.
Wouldn't even a Lefty agree with that?
Probably not most. However, I don't know anyone who is poor and hard-working unless they made very bad decisions in their lifetime.
False, however you don't make any significant money by sitting on your rear, collecting welfare. Hard work equals more money through Capitalism, which is the only fair system.
false..
a persons financial status is not necessarily a direct reflection of their ability or desire to work.
Many rich people come from rich families and are given a leg up.So no the argument that poor people are lazier is not true on the whole.
Could not be further from the truth.
i would say poor people are either lazy or dumb or sick, but they aren't none of them.
false. But there are wealthy people that worked har to get their fortune.
FALSE.
FLASE
TRUE OR FALSE? The plate tectonics theory says that forces within the earth cause the plates to move?
trueTRUE OR FALSE? The plate tectonics theory says that forces within the earth cause the plates to move?
SI CIERTO TRUETRUE OR FALSE? The plate tectonics theory says that forces within the earth cause the plates to move?
Ohh yeasss very true, I cant belive you did not know this.
true
True
SI CIERTO TRUETRUE OR FALSE? The plate tectonics theory says that forces within the earth cause the plates to move?
Ohh yeasss very true, I cant belive you did not know this.
true
True
True or False: Rush promises to NEVER say an inappropriate, offensive comment again?
I鈥檝e read the other answers and it seems most don鈥檛 separate WHAT he has to say from the WAY he says it.. ';Feminatz'; is only one of Limbaugh鈥檚 favorite expressions, and yet many here think he鈥檚 not offensive. What would it take? Anyway, False, because it鈥檚 in his contract to goad people on.True or False: Rush promises to NEVER say an inappropriate, offensive comment again?
ugh! rush limpballs.True or False: Rush promises to NEVER say an inappropriate, offensive comment again?
April fools.
Inappropriate is in the eye of the beholder. To most democrats, Rush is complete garbage, but to conservatives, he is true, honest, and smart.
In my opinion, I don't think he is offensive at all, just a little blunt with the truth.
And where does his freedom of speech that the liberals are always screaming everyone has? And you also have the freedom not to listen so why in the world do you if it bothers you this much?
False.*
Evidence 4 his worshipers:
';Service members who support U.S. withdrawal are ';Phony soldiers';.
Sept. 27, 2007
(My cousin died in this war and he is definitely not a phony.)
Inapproriate and offensive is in the eye of the beholder.
I defy you to quote one single offensive or inappropriate comment he has ever made.
I FEEL SOMETHING TRICKLING DOWN MY LEG!
Oh its your abhorrent comment of your own personal fairness doctrine!
True or False: Biden promises to not give away another national security secret this week.
I don't see how the truth could be misconstrued as inappropriate or offensive*******************************
say ONE COMMENT said by him that was INAPPROPRIATE and OFFENSIVE....I'm telliiiinggg yaaa, no proof, no answer. thanks.
When did he say inappropriate and offensive comments?Cats
ugh! rush limpballs.True or False: Rush promises to NEVER say an inappropriate, offensive comment again?
April fools.
Inappropriate is in the eye of the beholder. To most democrats, Rush is complete garbage, but to conservatives, he is true, honest, and smart.
In my opinion, I don't think he is offensive at all, just a little blunt with the truth.
And where does his freedom of speech that the liberals are always screaming everyone has? And you also have the freedom not to listen so why in the world do you if it bothers you this much?
False.*
Evidence 4 his worshipers:
';Service members who support U.S. withdrawal are ';Phony soldiers';.
Sept. 27, 2007
(My cousin died in this war and he is definitely not a phony.)
Inapproriate and offensive is in the eye of the beholder.
I defy you to quote one single offensive or inappropriate comment he has ever made.
I FEEL SOMETHING TRICKLING DOWN MY LEG!
Oh its your abhorrent comment of your own personal fairness doctrine!
True or False: Biden promises to not give away another national security secret this week.
I don't see how the truth could be misconstrued as inappropriate or offensive*******************************
say ONE COMMENT said by him that was INAPPROPRIATE and OFFENSIVE....I'm telliiiinggg yaaa, no proof, no answer. thanks.
When did he say inappropriate and offensive comments?
True or false help with one question please!?
healing of a partially torn ligament is slow because its hundreds of fibrous strands are poorly aligned
if its false what is the correct answer? and aligned is unerlined.True or false help with one question please!?
True??
if its false what is the correct answer? and aligned is unerlined.True or false help with one question please!?
True??
True or False, at the end of Meiosis 2,the end result are two haploid gametes?
False, there are 4 haploid gametes produced from meiosis.True or False, at the end of Meiosis 2,the end result are two haploid gametes?
true
true
True or False: Side action is A OK only on your birthday?
Girl you know I-I-I
Girl you know I-I-I
Don't need candles or cake
just need your body to make good
Birthday sex
Birthday sex
You know....like that song goes.
Am I right?True or False: Side action is A OK only on your birthday?
darn my birthday was in Feb..... but i guess it will be Feb again soon!!! hmmmm i do have a friend that i can get some side action from!! but he lives kinda far hey but his bday is coming soon too!!! so i will say True!!!!!!!True or False: Side action is A OK only on your birthday?
Yes everything you hear in rap songs makes perfect sense for everyone. All the time. Otherwise, why would they sing a play those lyrics?
What ever happened to the good old days when the songs were pro-society. Do you remember... '; Don't Do the Crime if you Can't to the Time, Don't Do It, Don't Do It...'; ???
False and you're not right.
You mean if your gay like you right? then its ok.
he's not talking bout side action, duh, just sex on his birthday
nope, you sure arent. You need help
Girl you know I-I-I
Don't need candles or cake
just need your body to make good
Birthday sex
Birthday sex
You know....like that song goes.
Am I right?True or False: Side action is A OK only on your birthday?
darn my birthday was in Feb..... but i guess it will be Feb again soon!!! hmmmm i do have a friend that i can get some side action from!! but he lives kinda far hey but his bday is coming soon too!!! so i will say True!!!!!!!True or False: Side action is A OK only on your birthday?
Yes everything you hear in rap songs makes perfect sense for everyone. All the time. Otherwise, why would they sing a play those lyrics?
What ever happened to the good old days when the songs were pro-society. Do you remember... '; Don't Do the Crime if you Can't to the Time, Don't Do It, Don't Do It...'; ???
False and you're not right.
You mean if your gay like you right? then its ok.
he's not talking bout side action, duh, just sex on his birthday
nope, you sure arent. You need help
TRUE OR FALSE- Sodium Chloride is toxic because of the sodium metal it contains?
i am leaning more towards true....?
please help me!
thxTRUE OR FALSE- Sodium Chloride is toxic because of the sodium metal it contains?
Sodium Chloride is table saltTRUE OR FALSE- Sodium Chloride is toxic because of the sodium metal it contains?
Sodium Chloride is SALT -- we put it on our food everyday
SO IT IS DEFINITELY FALSE
Thats definently FALSE. sodium chloride is salt. if it was toxic we would all be dead lol. so its false
please help me!
thxTRUE OR FALSE- Sodium Chloride is toxic because of the sodium metal it contains?
Sodium Chloride is table saltTRUE OR FALSE- Sodium Chloride is toxic because of the sodium metal it contains?
Sodium Chloride is SALT -- we put it on our food everyday
SO IT IS DEFINITELY FALSE
Thats definently FALSE. sodium chloride is salt. if it was toxic we would all be dead lol. so its false
True or false does shaving daily encourage more facial hair to grow? and please information wud be nice?
best answers will get 10 points im 16 and want to know thank you True or false does shaving daily encourage more facial hair to grow? and please information wud be nice?
i havent found this. I remember when i was younger around 14 i shaved my armpits in order to make them hairy...Nothing happened:( just took ages to grow back again.True or false does shaving daily encourage more facial hair to grow? and please information wud be nice?
I don't really know. If you have already started shaving then it is growing as fast as it will in the future. But if you don't shave yet and your facial hair isn't growing kind of like the hair on your arms. And you shave it then it will start growing fast and become coarse.
With this stupidness I always had a small moustache that I never shaved. And then there were these hairs that came out of my chin and then I shaved them. And then I got sort of a beard that grows and I have to sort of shave it every week. But my moustache doesn't grow at all and I don't need to shave it.
Yes, the more you shave the thicker the hair will grow. If you are trying to grow facial hair I wouldn't recommend this because as you get older you may end up with thicker hair than you want.
nahh just whiskers
just shave when you need too cuddy
Totally false. No physiological reason for it to occur. Hair is dead tissue, and cutting it off doesn't stimulate growth any more than rubbing or massaging the area you are shaving. Just an urban myth that occurs when not very bright boys start shaving one day, and a few weeks later notice they have more hair then they did when they first started shaving. Duh! Called natural development. The beard is coming in, and more develops as the guy matures. They would have the same amount of hair whether they shaved it or not.
No, shaving every day does not make your hair grow in thicker.
Look here: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/hair-re鈥?/a>
Ok Jas, When you shave the hair will grow back in about 3 weeks but then you wake up and you have 4 o'clock shadow that's because the hair you shaved 3 weeks ago is growing back. If you want a thick beard or groomed facial hair try shaving in the am and then wait until the next evening b4 bed to shave again, this gives the hair time to come out of shock. Every time you do something to any hair you shock it so you have to even out shaving time, don't shave at the same time every day.
Beauty Tip:
If you grow a beard or mustache and it gets fly away and springs in every direction use conditioner and wax and comb to train the short hair to lay down. It takes time but it works.
i havent found this. I remember when i was younger around 14 i shaved my armpits in order to make them hairy...Nothing happened:( just took ages to grow back again.True or false does shaving daily encourage more facial hair to grow? and please information wud be nice?
I don't really know. If you have already started shaving then it is growing as fast as it will in the future. But if you don't shave yet and your facial hair isn't growing kind of like the hair on your arms. And you shave it then it will start growing fast and become coarse.
With this stupidness I always had a small moustache that I never shaved. And then there were these hairs that came out of my chin and then I shaved them. And then I got sort of a beard that grows and I have to sort of shave it every week. But my moustache doesn't grow at all and I don't need to shave it.
Yes, the more you shave the thicker the hair will grow. If you are trying to grow facial hair I wouldn't recommend this because as you get older you may end up with thicker hair than you want.
nahh just whiskers
just shave when you need too cuddy
Totally false. No physiological reason for it to occur. Hair is dead tissue, and cutting it off doesn't stimulate growth any more than rubbing or massaging the area you are shaving. Just an urban myth that occurs when not very bright boys start shaving one day, and a few weeks later notice they have more hair then they did when they first started shaving. Duh! Called natural development. The beard is coming in, and more develops as the guy matures. They would have the same amount of hair whether they shaved it or not.
No, shaving every day does not make your hair grow in thicker.
Look here: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/hair-re鈥?/a>
Ok Jas, When you shave the hair will grow back in about 3 weeks but then you wake up and you have 4 o'clock shadow that's because the hair you shaved 3 weeks ago is growing back. If you want a thick beard or groomed facial hair try shaving in the am and then wait until the next evening b4 bed to shave again, this gives the hair time to come out of shock. Every time you do something to any hair you shock it so you have to even out shaving time, don't shave at the same time every day.
Beauty Tip:
If you grow a beard or mustache and it gets fly away and springs in every direction use conditioner and wax and comb to train the short hair to lay down. It takes time but it works.
True or False: Side action is allowed if you're a married and its a full moon.?
WHOOOOOOO.True or False: Side action is allowed if you're a married and its a full moon.?
yeah....thats the only time u are allowed...wow,guess what its a full moon tonite...wanna come over?...lolTrue or False: Side action is allowed if you're a married and its a full moon.?
What was that movie where the two middle aged guys are riding along in a car talking, and the one guy says that the other guy shouldn't cheat, but later the first guy says that he does cheat... and the second guy says ';what's the difference between you cheating and me cheating?'; and the first guy says ';because when i cheat, i don't think anything of it... but you have a conscience and it screws up everything for you';
Only if you're an actual werewolf, having sex with a real wolf.
Make sure you leave her before daylight...you don't want to stay for ';breakfast';.
Only if you are married to Georgio.
No - if you love your spouse and you are faithful you don't need any ';side action'; - full moon or not!
FALSE. What's the point of marriage if you're going to be a cheating deadbeat!
Sex is a go...I repeat...Sex is a go!!
lol! False!
Only for people who need to make an excuse to sleep better at night.
False.
hehehehheh
only if you want to be paying alimony for everyday after!!!
Nope - it's a pink moon that makes it okay!
When you've lost your moral compass, just look between your legs.
How bout a crescent moon?
No.
Not at all.
duh
only if one of you Howwwwwwwwwwlllllllllllllllllllllllsssss…Cats
yeah....thats the only time u are allowed...wow,guess what its a full moon tonite...wanna come over?...lolTrue or False: Side action is allowed if you're a married and its a full moon.?
What was that movie where the two middle aged guys are riding along in a car talking, and the one guy says that the other guy shouldn't cheat, but later the first guy says that he does cheat... and the second guy says ';what's the difference between you cheating and me cheating?'; and the first guy says ';because when i cheat, i don't think anything of it... but you have a conscience and it screws up everything for you';
Only if you're an actual werewolf, having sex with a real wolf.
Make sure you leave her before daylight...you don't want to stay for ';breakfast';.
Only if you are married to Georgio.
No - if you love your spouse and you are faithful you don't need any ';side action'; - full moon or not!
FALSE. What's the point of marriage if you're going to be a cheating deadbeat!
Sex is a go...I repeat...Sex is a go!!
lol! False!
Only for people who need to make an excuse to sleep better at night.
False.
hehehehheh
only if you want to be paying alimony for everyday after!!!
Nope - it's a pink moon that makes it okay!
When you've lost your moral compass, just look between your legs.
How bout a crescent moon?
No.
Not at all.
duh
only if one of you Howwwwwwwwwwlllllllllllllllllllllllsssss…
True or False? Two cultural groups of Jews with distinct histories are Sephardic and Ashkenazi.?
True.
Ashkenazi Jews are those of Eastern and Central European descent--countries like Poland, Lithuania, Russia, Ukraine, and Germany. Most Jews in the United States (myself included) are of Ashkenazi descent.
Sephardi are those Jews with ancestry in medieval Spain. They are found in certain European countries, Turkey, and the Middle East. (The term Sephardi is sometimes used more broadly to refer to any Jews from the Middle East, even those who do not have a family history in Spain.)
Ashkenazim and Sephardim (those are the plural forms) have distinct religious customs. For example, Ashkenazim do not eat rice on Passover, whereas Sephardim do.
I am not going to provide a reference; you can go to Wikipedia and look up the respective articles on Ashkenazi and Sephardi for more information.
Ashkenazi Jews are those of Eastern and Central European descent--countries like Poland, Lithuania, Russia, Ukraine, and Germany. Most Jews in the United States (myself included) are of Ashkenazi descent.
Sephardi are those Jews with ancestry in medieval Spain. They are found in certain European countries, Turkey, and the Middle East. (The term Sephardi is sometimes used more broadly to refer to any Jews from the Middle East, even those who do not have a family history in Spain.)
Ashkenazim and Sephardim (those are the plural forms) have distinct religious customs. For example, Ashkenazim do not eat rice on Passover, whereas Sephardim do.
I am not going to provide a reference; you can go to Wikipedia and look up the respective articles on Ashkenazi and Sephardi for more information.
TRUE OR FALSE AND QUESTIONS. 10 points for all the answers, and right?
1. Salt water is a homogeneous mixture.
2. Boiling point and freezing point are properties of matter.
3. Chemical changes produce new substances with new and physical properties.
4. Making ice cubes is a physical change.
--------------------------------------鈥?br>
1. ____ is not a physical property. ( SPECIFIC GRAVITY OR BURNING.)
2. Milk exists as a _____ (compound, heterogeneous mixture. or solution.
3. At room temperature, air is usually ___ (liquid gas, solid.)
4. the density of a pure volume can change if the (mass, volume, temperature.) of the substance is changed.
5. the decomposition of water is a (physical change, chemical change, or physcal property)TRUE OR FALSE AND QUESTIONS. 10 points for all the answers, and right?
False
true
true
true
burning
solution
gas
temperature
chemical change
that should be right, the only one im not sure about is the last oneTRUE OR FALSE AND QUESTIONS. 10 points for all the answers, and right?
1. True
2. True
3. True
4. True
1. Gravity
2. solution
3. gas
4. mass
5. chemical change
1. true
2. true
3. true
1. sp. gravity
2. mixture
3. gas
4. all of them
5. chemical
1. True
2. True
3. True
4. True
1. Burning (that isn't even a property)
2. Mixture
3. Gas (only most of the time. I breathe in solid air every once in a while)
4. Temperature
5. Chemical Change
1..False.
2..True.
3..True.
4..True.
1..Burning.
2..Heterogeneous mixture.
3..Gas.
4..Temperature.
5..Chemical change.
1 True
2 False
3 true
4 T
5 specific gravity
6 solution
7 gas
8 mass,volume
9 physical change
2. Boiling point and freezing point are properties of matter.
3. Chemical changes produce new substances with new and physical properties.
4. Making ice cubes is a physical change.
--------------------------------------鈥?br>
1. ____ is not a physical property. ( SPECIFIC GRAVITY OR BURNING.)
2. Milk exists as a _____ (compound, heterogeneous mixture. or solution.
3. At room temperature, air is usually ___ (liquid gas, solid.)
4. the density of a pure volume can change if the (mass, volume, temperature.) of the substance is changed.
5. the decomposition of water is a (physical change, chemical change, or physcal property)TRUE OR FALSE AND QUESTIONS. 10 points for all the answers, and right?
False
true
true
true
burning
solution
gas
temperature
chemical change
that should be right, the only one im not sure about is the last oneTRUE OR FALSE AND QUESTIONS. 10 points for all the answers, and right?
1. True
2. True
3. True
4. True
1. Gravity
2. solution
3. gas
4. mass
5. chemical change
1. true
2. true
3. true
1. sp. gravity
2. mixture
3. gas
4. all of them
5. chemical
1. True
2. True
3. True
4. True
1. Burning (that isn't even a property)
2. Mixture
3. Gas (only most of the time. I breathe in solid air every once in a while)
4. Temperature
5. Chemical Change
1..False.
2..True.
3..True.
4..True.
1..Burning.
2..Heterogeneous mixture.
3..Gas.
4..Temperature.
5..Chemical change.
1 True
2 False
3 true
4 T
5 specific gravity
6 solution
7 gas
8 mass,volume
9 physical change
True or false. food would no longer heat up if the frequency is changed on a microwave?
I would think that it would be TRUE. The reason I say that is because microwaves make the h2o molecules vibrate which produces heat. If the frequency was changed,it would no longer make the h2o molecules vibrate so there wouldn't be any heat produced.
TRUE OR FALSE.....In philosophy, materialism basically means a focus on buying things.?
please actually know the answer...TRUE OR FALSE.....In philosophy, materialism basically means a focus on buying things.?
FALSE
In philosophy, especially in metaphysics, materialism is the belief that the only things that exist are physical things. This means that materialists don't believe in souls, ghosts, phenomena, etc.
It is very different from the ';buying things'; version of materialism.TRUE OR FALSE.....In philosophy, materialism basically means a focus on buying things.?
False.
in my POV
materialism means giving importance for the physical anything over spiritual anything
exactly as rexrae said.
They condemn any faith or superstition, and embrace the importance of logic,reason, and the tangiable to obtain happiness
FALSE
In philosophy, especially in metaphysics, materialism is the belief that the only things that exist are physical things. This means that materialists don't believe in souls, ghosts, phenomena, etc.
It is very different from the ';buying things'; version of materialism.TRUE OR FALSE.....In philosophy, materialism basically means a focus on buying things.?
False.
in my POV
materialism means giving importance for the physical anything over spiritual anything
exactly as rexrae said.
They condemn any faith or superstition, and embrace the importance of logic,reason, and the tangiable to obtain happiness
True or False: You've gotten a little excited when a male dog starts humping your arm?
not just a little missy.True or False: You've gotten a little excited when a male dog starts humping your arm?
. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .``~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,
. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,
. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .\`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\
. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__
,,_. . . . . }.%26gt;-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,
. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`%26gt;--True or False: You've gotten a little excited when a male dog starts humping your arm?
False. That is so freaking creepy and gross. Little chihuahuas always do that to me. I passionately dislike those ugly little dogs. They are mean and annoying.
Don't get me wrong- I love animals. Give me a big, slobbery, lovable dog any day.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
SICKO
False sorry
Eh?, False...-
False
False.
haha
Sorry, No
false
false
Don't talk about your mum like that
Hell no
NO WAY!!!! That's just creepy. %26gt;.%26lt;
as long as he was wearing a condom
no. lol
hell to the no!
ew
ew falsee.
yes. i love that feeling. its so sensual
o___o Oh Yes! I'm very flattered when a dog humps my arm.
what have you been smoking
True. and i didnt have any sleeves so i got that skin on skin contact :)Cats
. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .``~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,
. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,
. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .\`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\
. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__
,,_. . . . . }.%26gt;-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,
. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`%26gt;--True or False: You've gotten a little excited when a male dog starts humping your arm?
False. That is so freaking creepy and gross. Little chihuahuas always do that to me. I passionately dislike those ugly little dogs. They are mean and annoying.
Don't get me wrong- I love animals. Give me a big, slobbery, lovable dog any day.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
SICKO
False sorry
Eh?, False...-
False
False.
haha
Sorry, No
false
false
Don't talk about your mum like that
Hell no
NO WAY!!!! That's just creepy. %26gt;.%26lt;
as long as he was wearing a condom
no. lol
hell to the no!
ew
ew falsee.
yes. i love that feeling. its so sensual
o___o Oh Yes! I'm very flattered when a dog humps my arm.
what have you been smoking
True. and i didnt have any sleeves so i got that skin on skin contact :)
True or false, inflection and concavity questions?
True or False, If false please explain why.
(1) the graph of every cubic polynomial has precisely one point of inflection
(2) f''(2)=0 then the graph of f must have a point of inflection at x=2
(3) If f ' (c)%26gt;0 then f is concave upward at x=cTrue or false, inflection and concavity questions?
1) affirmative
2) negative
3) affirmative
To understand why, graph some curves.True or false, inflection and concavity questions?
(3) = Did you mean f ' ' (c) ?
(1) the graph of every cubic polynomial has precisely one point of inflection
(2) f''(2)=0 then the graph of f must have a point of inflection at x=2
(3) If f ' (c)%26gt;0 then f is concave upward at x=cTrue or false, inflection and concavity questions?
1) affirmative
2) negative
3) affirmative
To understand why, graph some curves.True or false, inflection and concavity questions?
(3) = Did you mean f ' ' (c) ?
True or false vector question?
';Every set of 3 vectors in R2 is linearly dependent?';
I say this is false because you can have e1,e2 and the zero vector as a set, which is linearly independent?
Can anybody explain this one to me?True or false vector question?
Note : the zero vector is never in a linearly independent set of vector
Answer is TRUETrue or false vector question?
true
I say this is false because you can have e1,e2 and the zero vector as a set, which is linearly independent?
Can anybody explain this one to me?True or false vector question?
Note : the zero vector is never in a linearly independent set of vector
Answer is TRUETrue or false vector question?
true
True or False: You hate when others try to act superior?
It true, share your experience please.True or False: You hate when others try to act superior?
True, my manager thinks she's better than us because she has the final say. And she's only a year older than me. It's very irritating.True or False: You hate when others try to act superior?
true,they tried but it didnt work
I laugh at it now. No use wasting energy hating it.
As if their was anyone like that to me....smile
True. I don't like it when someone acts superior
True but theres a thing that comforts me ... those guys are immature so that means im mature
true
very very true.
True, my manager thinks she's better than us because she has the final say. And she's only a year older than me. It's very irritating.True or False: You hate when others try to act superior?
true,they tried but it didnt work
I laugh at it now. No use wasting energy hating it.
As if their was anyone like that to me....smile
True. I don't like it when someone acts superior
True but theres a thing that comforts me ... those guys are immature so that means im mature
true
very very true.
True or false: a triangle exterior angle is supplementary to the adjacent angle?
TRUE
If memory serves, the exterior angle is formed by extending one of the lines of a side of a triangle. Since the angle inside the triangle plus the newly formed angle on the outside comprise a straight line (180掳), the two angles are supplementary by definition.
If memory serves, the exterior angle is formed by extending one of the lines of a side of a triangle. Since the angle inside the triangle plus the newly formed angle on the outside comprise a straight line (180掳), the two angles are supplementary by definition.
True or false? an object can be accelerating even if its speed is constant?
True. Acceleration is change in velocity, which is both speed and direction.. If an object is moving at a constant speed but changing directions (for example, constant circular motion) it is accelerating.True or false? an object can be accelerating even if its speed is constant?
True. Centripetal motion.
Force = Mass * Acceleration
Force also equals mv^2 / r
Velocity is constant, but a force is still being produced, thusly there is acceleration.True or false? an object can be accelerating even if its speed is constant?
False, by definition. But if by ';speed';, you actually mean ';velocity';, then true. Previous response is correct.
I learned about that and its FALSE
True. Centripetal motion.
Force = Mass * Acceleration
Force also equals mv^2 / r
Velocity is constant, but a force is still being produced, thusly there is acceleration.True or false? an object can be accelerating even if its speed is constant?
False, by definition. But if by ';speed';, you actually mean ';velocity';, then true. Previous response is correct.
I learned about that and its FALSE
True or false? enlightenment literature pianted a picture of a world of excess and foolishness.?
refering to the french revolutionTrue or false? enlightenment literature pianted a picture of a world of excess and foolishness.?
True.
Whether or not it was really a ';world of excess and foolishness';, it certainly was common practice in Enlightenment literature to describe it as such.True or false? enlightenment literature pianted a picture of a world of excess and foolishness.?
I am gonna say false. It came down to the haves and have nots. However, opulence and lasciviousness on behalf of the royalty helped usher in the revolution through sheer disgust, rage, anger not to mention hunger and the will to survive.
falseCats
True.
Whether or not it was really a ';world of excess and foolishness';, it certainly was common practice in Enlightenment literature to describe it as such.True or false? enlightenment literature pianted a picture of a world of excess and foolishness.?
I am gonna say false. It came down to the haves and have nots. However, opulence and lasciviousness on behalf of the royalty helped usher in the revolution through sheer disgust, rage, anger not to mention hunger and the will to survive.
false
I hear that if you look at a portrait during pregnancy, your baby will look like that person. True or false?
So, if you stare at a picture of Hitler for your entire pregnancy and even though you may have a girl, you are telling me you are going to have a woman who looks like Hitler... come on now....I hear that if you look at a portrait during pregnancy, your baby will look like that person. True or false?
I think I know what your talking about but its not that your baby will look like that person, its more like looking at ugly things and pretty things, well what you asked is definitely false but you wouldn't want to be looking at an evil ugly thing for example a picture of a gremlin when your pregnant .I'm not sure how to really explain it but its kinda like whatever your heart thinks of reflects your face.I hear that if you look at a portrait during pregnancy, your baby will look like that person. True or false?
LMAO
Unless the portrait you're looking at is your spouse (or the person you got pregnant with), I'd say the probability of that happening is rather low. Your child is one half you and one half the person you conceived with - what does someone else's picture have to do with it? LOL
Let me ask you a question...If both you and your husband happen to be of Chinese decent and your baby is 100% Chinese but you look at a portrait of say..Barack Obama everyday...do you really think you baby would come out looking like him?
I ve heard something Similar... if you look at pretty people during pregnancy your Baby will be Pretty... but I dont believe it its an old wives tale... dont think too much in to it... baby will look like you and the Father and Hopefully not like a Neighbor :)
I would imagine false. I looked at various portraits during my pregnancy and my baby still looks like her daddy. None of the portraits were of him!
Absolutely right. The reason that I look like Tom Cruise (only taller) is because my mum looked at pictures of him in ';Woman's Own'; magazine.
ofcourse its true. Its been scientifically proven. It makes alot of sense aswell.
Hee hee - outrageous old wive`s tale and urban myth.
lol thats dumb ive also heard if u luk at a monkey ur child will luk like a monkey
If it's a portrait of the guy who knocked you up.
umm false, how could you even question that... how ridiculous
What the hell? I agree with drustinn, but I've never heard this stuff before XD
where on earth did you hear that? total rubbish.
lmao not true
false wtf
Never in my life have I heard of that!
False...wtf...? i would love to know who told you that...acctually no i wouldnt..
I think I know what your talking about but its not that your baby will look like that person, its more like looking at ugly things and pretty things, well what you asked is definitely false but you wouldn't want to be looking at an evil ugly thing for example a picture of a gremlin when your pregnant .I'm not sure how to really explain it but its kinda like whatever your heart thinks of reflects your face.I hear that if you look at a portrait during pregnancy, your baby will look like that person. True or false?
LMAO
Unless the portrait you're looking at is your spouse (or the person you got pregnant with), I'd say the probability of that happening is rather low. Your child is one half you and one half the person you conceived with - what does someone else's picture have to do with it? LOL
Let me ask you a question...If both you and your husband happen to be of Chinese decent and your baby is 100% Chinese but you look at a portrait of say..Barack Obama everyday...do you really think you baby would come out looking like him?
I ve heard something Similar... if you look at pretty people during pregnancy your Baby will be Pretty... but I dont believe it its an old wives tale... dont think too much in to it... baby will look like you and the Father and Hopefully not like a Neighbor :)
I would imagine false. I looked at various portraits during my pregnancy and my baby still looks like her daddy. None of the portraits were of him!
Absolutely right. The reason that I look like Tom Cruise (only taller) is because my mum looked at pictures of him in ';Woman's Own'; magazine.
ofcourse its true. Its been scientifically proven. It makes alot of sense aswell.
Hee hee - outrageous old wive`s tale and urban myth.
lol thats dumb ive also heard if u luk at a monkey ur child will luk like a monkey
If it's a portrait of the guy who knocked you up.
umm false, how could you even question that... how ridiculous
What the hell? I agree with drustinn, but I've never heard this stuff before XD
where on earth did you hear that? total rubbish.
lmao not true
false wtf
Never in my life have I heard of that!
False...wtf...? i would love to know who told you that...acctually no i wouldnt..
True or False: F- and O2- ions have the same electron configuration?
Yes, they have the same amount of electrons and thus they have the same ground state electron configuration.
True or False: Both Sperm produced within a pollen grain are genetically unique.?
I'm gonna have to say false.
Each pollen grain will be genetically unique, however, the nuclei within a single pollen grain are genetically identical. Think of pollen production being similar to spermatogenesis, but then add some post-meiotic events. This means that you'll get 4 genetically unique cells at the end of meiosis. Each cell will develop into a pollen grain. Development into a pollen grain requires the cell to produce more nuclei. Each cell will undergo karyokinesis which is a type of endomitosis. Since this is mitosis, the nuclei produced are the same as the nuclei initially in the cell. Each cell produces an additional nuclei and a tube nuclei in typical angiosperms. This means that the genetic makeup of the nuclei in a single pollen grain are identical. So the answer is false.True or False: Both Sperm produced within a pollen grain are genetically unique.?
very true
Each pollen grain will be genetically unique, however, the nuclei within a single pollen grain are genetically identical. Think of pollen production being similar to spermatogenesis, but then add some post-meiotic events. This means that you'll get 4 genetically unique cells at the end of meiosis. Each cell will develop into a pollen grain. Development into a pollen grain requires the cell to produce more nuclei. Each cell will undergo karyokinesis which is a type of endomitosis. Since this is mitosis, the nuclei produced are the same as the nuclei initially in the cell. Each cell produces an additional nuclei and a tube nuclei in typical angiosperms. This means that the genetic makeup of the nuclei in a single pollen grain are identical. So the answer is false.True or False: Both Sperm produced within a pollen grain are genetically unique.?
very true
True or False? A gene may encode information needed by a cell to produce mRNA and tRNA but not rRNA?
false...a gene only encodes mRNA which can be translated into a protein. tRNA and rRNA are both non-coding RNA species that serve structural and catalytic roles in protein synthesis (translation)True or False? A gene may encode information needed by a cell to produce mRNA and tRNA but not rRNA?
False.
ALL RNA are encoded, or transcribed, from DNA (genes),
mRNA are RNA that are used to translate into proteins.
tRNA are RNA that are used to transport amino acids.
rRNA form ribosomes that is used for docking amino acid chains.
mRNA, tRNA and rRNA differ only in function not composition (nucleic acids) or origin.True or False? A gene may encode information needed by a cell to produce mRNA and tRNA but not rRNA?
True, messenger RNA makes a copy of the gene on the DNA and then goes to the ribosome where amino acids on transfer RNAs corresponding to the codes on the mRNA are added to form a chain ie protein.
Ribosomal RNAs are formed by a different process unrelated to DNA.
FALSE- Many RNAs do not code for protein however. These non-coding RNAs can be encoded by their own genes (RNA genes), but can also derive from mRNA introns. The most prominent examples of non-coding RNAs are transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA), both of which are involved in the process of translation.
False.
ALL RNA are encoded, or transcribed, from DNA (genes),
mRNA are RNA that are used to translate into proteins.
tRNA are RNA that are used to transport amino acids.
rRNA form ribosomes that is used for docking amino acid chains.
mRNA, tRNA and rRNA differ only in function not composition (nucleic acids) or origin.True or False? A gene may encode information needed by a cell to produce mRNA and tRNA but not rRNA?
True, messenger RNA makes a copy of the gene on the DNA and then goes to the ribosome where amino acids on transfer RNAs corresponding to the codes on the mRNA are added to form a chain ie protein.
Ribosomal RNAs are formed by a different process unrelated to DNA.
FALSE- Many RNAs do not code for protein however. These non-coding RNAs can be encoded by their own genes (RNA genes), but can also derive from mRNA introns. The most prominent examples of non-coding RNAs are transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA), both of which are involved in the process of translation.
True or false for each of these geometry statements?
If a point is on a plane, then the line it is on is on that plane
If a line is on the plane then a pt on the line is on that plane
if a pt isn't on a plane, then the line it is on isn't on the plane
If a line isn't on the plane, then a pt on the line isn't on that planeTrue or false for each of these geometry statements?
false, both (all) points defining the line must be on the plane for the line to be on the plane
true
true
true
If a line is on the plane then a pt on the line is on that plane
if a pt isn't on a plane, then the line it is on isn't on the plane
If a line isn't on the plane, then a pt on the line isn't on that planeTrue or false for each of these geometry statements?
false, both (all) points defining the line must be on the plane for the line to be on the plane
true
true
true
True or False: If a guy asks for your number for no apparent reason, he probably likes you?
no he wants to sell you aluminum siding for your houseTrue or False: If a guy asks for your number for no apparent reason, he probably likes you?
not always, really depends on the setting. example- if you're at a drinking/ smoking bar he probably doesn't actually like you but he wants something from you, (you probably now what.) if you're somewhere more peaceful like school or at a library the chances are much higher.True or False: If a guy asks for your number for no apparent reason, he probably likes you?
it could be either. if this guy constantly hangs around you and is making sure he sees you even if he goes out of his way then yes. but if hes the kind of guy that's very social then maybe no and hes just trying to get to know you better. but only way to truly find out for yourself is by asking him.
False he might want to just talk to you
sometimes it goes either way depending on the guy
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
false. he could just want to be friends or keep in touch. or he may want someone new to text. it's totally normal. I've been asked for my number by countless guys who really just wanted to talk to me. love, kelly.
please answer mine.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
Probably. But I know this one girl, and a guy asked him for her number randomly one day. When she gave it to him, he carved it into his desk and its still there.
it`s an in between. 1. depends on the guy. 2. how long you`ve known him. 3. how you know him...
You have the best judgment.
id say true but im not a guy
check out mine
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
Likes your body?(true)
Likes you as a person?(false)
true but only is he trys to flirt with you first but then agian he could just be trying to get into bed with you so im kind of one the bench here
True, if he asks for your personal information, he's gotta have some interest in you
not in all cases.
but if he texts or calls you with a flirty mood.
he might
But he might just think your fun to talk to or something.
not really i have all my girl friends numbers and i asked them and i dont really like them
NO
He wants to make sure that if he dials a wrong number it is not yours because he hates you and thinks you're ugly.
DUH!
False, not necessarily.
It could be true, but it could also be a bet or for fun. If he calls, then maybe he likes you.... it depends really
Hi!
False, He probably think's he could like you, but he doesn't quite like you.
yes thats 100% tru i have a bunch of girls numbers cause i like them but they never like me so wat did he say was his reason for having it if he gave one
False he just wants an easy way to go out with you instead of taking some time to getting to know you
It could be true, but there could be other reasons, we dont what else is going on with you two
Depends.
Depends.
True, unless he is your friend, but in that case there would be a reason.
Most likely true.
It depends; does he know what your parents would do? Mine. . .let's just say that he'll regret it.
True girllll
False.
He just wants to stick his twig in your panties.
True: but he either likes you or thinks your just a hottie!
true
if u think he likes u and u like him...then if he asks for ur number than yessss
falseeee.
He probably wants to get laid....Cats
not always, really depends on the setting. example- if you're at a drinking/ smoking bar he probably doesn't actually like you but he wants something from you, (you probably now what.) if you're somewhere more peaceful like school or at a library the chances are much higher.True or False: If a guy asks for your number for no apparent reason, he probably likes you?
it could be either. if this guy constantly hangs around you and is making sure he sees you even if he goes out of his way then yes. but if hes the kind of guy that's very social then maybe no and hes just trying to get to know you better. but only way to truly find out for yourself is by asking him.
False he might want to just talk to you
sometimes it goes either way depending on the guy
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
false. he could just want to be friends or keep in touch. or he may want someone new to text. it's totally normal. I've been asked for my number by countless guys who really just wanted to talk to me. love, kelly.
please answer mine.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
Probably. But I know this one girl, and a guy asked him for her number randomly one day. When she gave it to him, he carved it into his desk and its still there.
it`s an in between. 1. depends on the guy. 2. how long you`ve known him. 3. how you know him...
You have the best judgment.
id say true but im not a guy
check out mine
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
Likes your body?(true)
Likes you as a person?(false)
true but only is he trys to flirt with you first but then agian he could just be trying to get into bed with you so im kind of one the bench here
True, if he asks for your personal information, he's gotta have some interest in you
not in all cases.
but if he texts or calls you with a flirty mood.
he might
But he might just think your fun to talk to or something.
not really i have all my girl friends numbers and i asked them and i dont really like them
NO
He wants to make sure that if he dials a wrong number it is not yours because he hates you and thinks you're ugly.
DUH!
False, not necessarily.
It could be true, but it could also be a bet or for fun. If he calls, then maybe he likes you.... it depends really
Hi!
False, He probably think's he could like you, but he doesn't quite like you.
yes thats 100% tru i have a bunch of girls numbers cause i like them but they never like me so wat did he say was his reason for having it if he gave one
False he just wants an easy way to go out with you instead of taking some time to getting to know you
It could be true, but there could be other reasons, we dont what else is going on with you two
Depends.
Depends.
True, unless he is your friend, but in that case there would be a reason.
Most likely true.
It depends; does he know what your parents would do? Mine. . .let's just say that he'll regret it.
True girllll
False.
He just wants to stick his twig in your panties.
True: but he either likes you or thinks your just a hottie!
true
if u think he likes u and u like him...then if he asks for ur number than yessss
falseeee.
He probably wants to get laid....
True or false? if a person who is accused of a crime in state a goes to state b, no one can make him go to... ?
state a to be tried again?True or false? if a person who is accused of a crime in state a goes to state b, no one can make him go to... ?
False... If a person is accused (not tried and acquitted) of a crime in State A goes to State B, is arrested and refuses to go back to State A voluntarily for trial.. State A files a request for extradition with State B the courts in State B listen to the extradition arguments and decide if they will send the person back to State A or not (More often than not the person is extradited very quickly)... If State B decided to send the person back to State A the person has no say in the matter...True or false? if a person who is accused of a crime in state a goes to state b, no one can make him go to... ?
Probably false. Just crossing a state line does not protect your from being arrested for a crime in another state. All of the states allow extradition to another state. Unless you are being held for a crime in the second state. then they will want to try and convict you first. Then they may ship you to the other state for trial on that charge.
if a wanted person crosses a state line, you don`t need worry about being tried in either state court, its automatically becomes a FEDERAL item, if convicted, you`ll be going away for a long time, no early out or parole, it just depends on how bad the feds want to put you away, check out the mann act, tax evasion charges and there are more
That would be false, if charges are filed and he is arrested in State B, he would be extridited to state A.
LOL... False... Its up to the state if they want to bother with extraditing you or not.. Depends on the crime...LOL.. What did you do??
If you get arrested in state b they send you back to state a for a trial.
Completely false.
Ask O.J. Simpson
False
In general, state A can apply to state B for extradition; State B will normally grant that. State B will arrest the person and transport them back to State A.
False... If a person is accused (not tried and acquitted) of a crime in State A goes to State B, is arrested and refuses to go back to State A voluntarily for trial.. State A files a request for extradition with State B the courts in State B listen to the extradition arguments and decide if they will send the person back to State A or not (More often than not the person is extradited very quickly)... If State B decided to send the person back to State A the person has no say in the matter...True or false? if a person who is accused of a crime in state a goes to state b, no one can make him go to... ?
Probably false. Just crossing a state line does not protect your from being arrested for a crime in another state. All of the states allow extradition to another state. Unless you are being held for a crime in the second state. then they will want to try and convict you first. Then they may ship you to the other state for trial on that charge.
if a wanted person crosses a state line, you don`t need worry about being tried in either state court, its automatically becomes a FEDERAL item, if convicted, you`ll be going away for a long time, no early out or parole, it just depends on how bad the feds want to put you away, check out the mann act, tax evasion charges and there are more
That would be false, if charges are filed and he is arrested in State B, he would be extridited to state A.
LOL... False... Its up to the state if they want to bother with extraditing you or not.. Depends on the crime...LOL.. What did you do??
If you get arrested in state b they send you back to state a for a trial.
Completely false.
Ask O.J. Simpson
False
In general, state A can apply to state B for extradition; State B will normally grant that. State B will arrest the person and transport them back to State A.
True or False: F- and O2- ions have the same electron configuration?
Yes, they have the same amount of electrons and thus they have the same ground state electron configuration.
True or False: Both Sperm produced within a pollen grain are genetically unique.?
I'm gonna have to say false.
Each pollen grain will be genetically unique, however, the nuclei within a single pollen grain are genetically identical. Think of pollen production being similar to spermatogenesis, but then add some post-meiotic events. This means that you'll get 4 genetically unique cells at the end of meiosis. Each cell will develop into a pollen grain. Development into a pollen grain requires the cell to produce more nuclei. Each cell will undergo karyokinesis which is a type of endomitosis. Since this is mitosis, the nuclei produced are the same as the nuclei initially in the cell. Each cell produces an additional nuclei and a tube nuclei in typical angiosperms. This means that the genetic makeup of the nuclei in a single pollen grain are identical. So the answer is false.True or False: Both Sperm produced within a pollen grain are genetically unique.?
very true
Each pollen grain will be genetically unique, however, the nuclei within a single pollen grain are genetically identical. Think of pollen production being similar to spermatogenesis, but then add some post-meiotic events. This means that you'll get 4 genetically unique cells at the end of meiosis. Each cell will develop into a pollen grain. Development into a pollen grain requires the cell to produce more nuclei. Each cell will undergo karyokinesis which is a type of endomitosis. Since this is mitosis, the nuclei produced are the same as the nuclei initially in the cell. Each cell produces an additional nuclei and a tube nuclei in typical angiosperms. This means that the genetic makeup of the nuclei in a single pollen grain are identical. So the answer is false.True or False: Both Sperm produced within a pollen grain are genetically unique.?
very true
True or False? A gene may encode information needed by a cell to produce mRNA and tRNA but not rRNA?
false...a gene only encodes mRNA which can be translated into a protein. tRNA and rRNA are both non-coding RNA species that serve structural and catalytic roles in protein synthesis (translation)True or False? A gene may encode information needed by a cell to produce mRNA and tRNA but not rRNA?
False.
ALL RNA are encoded, or transcribed, from DNA (genes),
mRNA are RNA that are used to translate into proteins.
tRNA are RNA that are used to transport amino acids.
rRNA form ribosomes that is used for docking amino acid chains.
mRNA, tRNA and rRNA differ only in function not composition (nucleic acids) or origin.True or False? A gene may encode information needed by a cell to produce mRNA and tRNA but not rRNA?
True, messenger RNA makes a copy of the gene on the DNA and then goes to the ribosome where amino acids on transfer RNAs corresponding to the codes on the mRNA are added to form a chain ie protein.
Ribosomal RNAs are formed by a different process unrelated to DNA.
FALSE- Many RNAs do not code for protein however. These non-coding RNAs can be encoded by their own genes (RNA genes), but can also derive from mRNA introns. The most prominent examples of non-coding RNAs are transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA), both of which are involved in the process of translation.
False.
ALL RNA are encoded, or transcribed, from DNA (genes),
mRNA are RNA that are used to translate into proteins.
tRNA are RNA that are used to transport amino acids.
rRNA form ribosomes that is used for docking amino acid chains.
mRNA, tRNA and rRNA differ only in function not composition (nucleic acids) or origin.True or False? A gene may encode information needed by a cell to produce mRNA and tRNA but not rRNA?
True, messenger RNA makes a copy of the gene on the DNA and then goes to the ribosome where amino acids on transfer RNAs corresponding to the codes on the mRNA are added to form a chain ie protein.
Ribosomal RNAs are formed by a different process unrelated to DNA.
FALSE- Many RNAs do not code for protein however. These non-coding RNAs can be encoded by their own genes (RNA genes), but can also derive from mRNA introns. The most prominent examples of non-coding RNAs are transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA), both of which are involved in the process of translation.
True or false for each of these geometry statements?
If a point is on a plane, then the line it is on is on that plane
If a line is on the plane then a pt on the line is on that plane
if a pt isn't on a plane, then the line it is on isn't on the plane
If a line isn't on the plane, then a pt on the line isn't on that planeTrue or false for each of these geometry statements?
false, both (all) points defining the line must be on the plane for the line to be on the plane
true
true
true
If a line is on the plane then a pt on the line is on that plane
if a pt isn't on a plane, then the line it is on isn't on the plane
If a line isn't on the plane, then a pt on the line isn't on that planeTrue or false for each of these geometry statements?
false, both (all) points defining the line must be on the plane for the line to be on the plane
true
true
true
True or False: If a guy asks for your number for no apparent reason, he probably likes you?
no he wants to sell you aluminum siding for your houseTrue or False: If a guy asks for your number for no apparent reason, he probably likes you?
not always, really depends on the setting. example- if you're at a drinking/ smoking bar he probably doesn't actually like you but he wants something from you, (you probably now what.) if you're somewhere more peaceful like school or at a library the chances are much higher.True or False: If a guy asks for your number for no apparent reason, he probably likes you?
it could be either. if this guy constantly hangs around you and is making sure he sees you even if he goes out of his way then yes. but if hes the kind of guy that's very social then maybe no and hes just trying to get to know you better. but only way to truly find out for yourself is by asking him.
False he might want to just talk to you
sometimes it goes either way depending on the guy
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
false. he could just want to be friends or keep in touch. or he may want someone new to text. it's totally normal. I've been asked for my number by countless guys who really just wanted to talk to me. love, kelly.
please answer mine.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
Probably. But I know this one girl, and a guy asked him for her number randomly one day. When she gave it to him, he carved it into his desk and its still there.
it`s an in between. 1. depends on the guy. 2. how long you`ve known him. 3. how you know him...
You have the best judgment.
id say true but im not a guy
check out mine
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
Likes your body?(true)
Likes you as a person?(false)
true but only is he trys to flirt with you first but then agian he could just be trying to get into bed with you so im kind of one the bench here
True, if he asks for your personal information, he's gotta have some interest in you
not in all cases.
but if he texts or calls you with a flirty mood.
he might
But he might just think your fun to talk to or something.
not really i have all my girl friends numbers and i asked them and i dont really like them
NO
He wants to make sure that if he dials a wrong number it is not yours because he hates you and thinks you're ugly.
DUH!
False, not necessarily.
It could be true, but it could also be a bet or for fun. If he calls, then maybe he likes you.... it depends really
Hi!
False, He probably think's he could like you, but he doesn't quite like you.
yes thats 100% tru i have a bunch of girls numbers cause i like them but they never like me so wat did he say was his reason for having it if he gave one
False he just wants an easy way to go out with you instead of taking some time to getting to know you
It could be true, but there could be other reasons, we dont what else is going on with you two
Depends.
Depends.
True, unless he is your friend, but in that case there would be a reason.
Most likely true.
It depends; does he know what your parents would do? Mine. . .let's just say that he'll regret it.
True girllll
False.
He just wants to stick his twig in your panties.
True: but he either likes you or thinks your just a hottie!
true
if u think he likes u and u like him...then if he asks for ur number than yessss
falseeee.
He probably wants to get laid....Cats
not always, really depends on the setting. example- if you're at a drinking/ smoking bar he probably doesn't actually like you but he wants something from you, (you probably now what.) if you're somewhere more peaceful like school or at a library the chances are much higher.True or False: If a guy asks for your number for no apparent reason, he probably likes you?
it could be either. if this guy constantly hangs around you and is making sure he sees you even if he goes out of his way then yes. but if hes the kind of guy that's very social then maybe no and hes just trying to get to know you better. but only way to truly find out for yourself is by asking him.
False he might want to just talk to you
sometimes it goes either way depending on the guy
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
false. he could just want to be friends or keep in touch. or he may want someone new to text. it's totally normal. I've been asked for my number by countless guys who really just wanted to talk to me. love, kelly.
please answer mine.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
Probably. But I know this one girl, and a guy asked him for her number randomly one day. When she gave it to him, he carved it into his desk and its still there.
it`s an in between. 1. depends on the guy. 2. how long you`ve known him. 3. how you know him...
You have the best judgment.
id say true but im not a guy
check out mine
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
Likes your body?(true)
Likes you as a person?(false)
true but only is he trys to flirt with you first but then agian he could just be trying to get into bed with you so im kind of one the bench here
True, if he asks for your personal information, he's gotta have some interest in you
not in all cases.
but if he texts or calls you with a flirty mood.
he might
But he might just think your fun to talk to or something.
not really i have all my girl friends numbers and i asked them and i dont really like them
NO
He wants to make sure that if he dials a wrong number it is not yours because he hates you and thinks you're ugly.
DUH!
False, not necessarily.
It could be true, but it could also be a bet or for fun. If he calls, then maybe he likes you.... it depends really
Hi!
False, He probably think's he could like you, but he doesn't quite like you.
yes thats 100% tru i have a bunch of girls numbers cause i like them but they never like me so wat did he say was his reason for having it if he gave one
False he just wants an easy way to go out with you instead of taking some time to getting to know you
It could be true, but there could be other reasons, we dont what else is going on with you two
Depends.
Depends.
True, unless he is your friend, but in that case there would be a reason.
Most likely true.
It depends; does he know what your parents would do? Mine. . .let's just say that he'll regret it.
True girllll
False.
He just wants to stick his twig in your panties.
True: but he either likes you or thinks your just a hottie!
true
if u think he likes u and u like him...then if he asks for ur number than yessss
falseeee.
He probably wants to get laid....
True or false? if a person who is accused of a crime in state a goes to state b, no one can make him go to... ?
state a to be tried again?True or false? if a person who is accused of a crime in state a goes to state b, no one can make him go to... ?
False... If a person is accused (not tried and acquitted) of a crime in State A goes to State B, is arrested and refuses to go back to State A voluntarily for trial.. State A files a request for extradition with State B the courts in State B listen to the extradition arguments and decide if they will send the person back to State A or not (More often than not the person is extradited very quickly)... If State B decided to send the person back to State A the person has no say in the matter...True or false? if a person who is accused of a crime in state a goes to state b, no one can make him go to... ?
Probably false. Just crossing a state line does not protect your from being arrested for a crime in another state. All of the states allow extradition to another state. Unless you are being held for a crime in the second state. then they will want to try and convict you first. Then they may ship you to the other state for trial on that charge.
if a wanted person crosses a state line, you don`t need worry about being tried in either state court, its automatically becomes a FEDERAL item, if convicted, you`ll be going away for a long time, no early out or parole, it just depends on how bad the feds want to put you away, check out the mann act, tax evasion charges and there are more
That would be false, if charges are filed and he is arrested in State B, he would be extridited to state A.
LOL... False... Its up to the state if they want to bother with extraditing you or not.. Depends on the crime...LOL.. What did you do??
If you get arrested in state b they send you back to state a for a trial.
Completely false.
Ask O.J. Simpson
False
In general, state A can apply to state B for extradition; State B will normally grant that. State B will arrest the person and transport them back to State A.
False... If a person is accused (not tried and acquitted) of a crime in State A goes to State B, is arrested and refuses to go back to State A voluntarily for trial.. State A files a request for extradition with State B the courts in State B listen to the extradition arguments and decide if they will send the person back to State A or not (More often than not the person is extradited very quickly)... If State B decided to send the person back to State A the person has no say in the matter...True or false? if a person who is accused of a crime in state a goes to state b, no one can make him go to... ?
Probably false. Just crossing a state line does not protect your from being arrested for a crime in another state. All of the states allow extradition to another state. Unless you are being held for a crime in the second state. then they will want to try and convict you first. Then they may ship you to the other state for trial on that charge.
if a wanted person crosses a state line, you don`t need worry about being tried in either state court, its automatically becomes a FEDERAL item, if convicted, you`ll be going away for a long time, no early out or parole, it just depends on how bad the feds want to put you away, check out the mann act, tax evasion charges and there are more
That would be false, if charges are filed and he is arrested in State B, he would be extridited to state A.
LOL... False... Its up to the state if they want to bother with extraditing you or not.. Depends on the crime...LOL.. What did you do??
If you get arrested in state b they send you back to state a for a trial.
Completely false.
Ask O.J. Simpson
False
In general, state A can apply to state B for extradition; State B will normally grant that. State B will arrest the person and transport them back to State A.
True or False: You start the drama, then you sit back and watch it unfold?
lol..True or False: You start the drama, then you sit back and watch it unfold?
No, False, if theres a Drama ?, l wanna be The Star- lm a Real Drama queen-lol. love Jo xx
l love your questions-lol. l have starred them ALL. Thanks.xx
OOps- sorry jen- l will try to cut the drama when l answer you-lol.PEACE. xxTrue or False: You start the drama, then you sit back and watch it unfold?
Lol, now and then.
false i can't stand drama because i someone did that to me and made there selves look stupid .
false...that is something i hate with a passion....DRAMA, DRAMA, DRAMA!
guilty
False thats just rong to do.
STAR, I do sometimes! Take good care! xx Jimmy.
true, sometimes it's a good way to get things moving. Wind others up and watch them fight it out, then pick up the pieces urself..
False I may have said some things but nothing ever happened.
false
False. I hate drama...don't start it and don't like to be part of it....... but I see other people doing that.
false i avoid the drama i try to live a healthy stress free life..lol
not personally but i know people who do. nobody is perfect and perhaps that is part of their personality. sad but true. just make sure you dont make the same mistakes as others.
this big bad world i hate,
i should of listened to my mum when she said wait,
wait for the big bad world,
there's no give, there's just take,
**** don't come on a plate,
it just come out the face of some two faced mate!!!!!
false
Did I tell you about the time I went to a male strip bar, and took a couple of hunks home with me?
False
not me...drama just seems to find me
No, False, if theres a Drama ?, l wanna be The Star- lm a Real Drama queen-lol. love Jo xx
l love your questions-lol. l have starred them ALL. Thanks.xx
OOps- sorry jen- l will try to cut the drama when l answer you-lol.PEACE. xxTrue or False: You start the drama, then you sit back and watch it unfold?
Lol, now and then.
false i can't stand drama because i someone did that to me and made there selves look stupid .
false...that is something i hate with a passion....DRAMA, DRAMA, DRAMA!
guilty
False thats just rong to do.
STAR, I do sometimes! Take good care! xx Jimmy.
true, sometimes it's a good way to get things moving. Wind others up and watch them fight it out, then pick up the pieces urself..
False I may have said some things but nothing ever happened.
false
False. I hate drama...don't start it and don't like to be part of it....... but I see other people doing that.
false i avoid the drama i try to live a healthy stress free life..lol
not personally but i know people who do. nobody is perfect and perhaps that is part of their personality. sad but true. just make sure you dont make the same mistakes as others.
this big bad world i hate,
i should of listened to my mum when she said wait,
wait for the big bad world,
there's no give, there's just take,
**** don't come on a plate,
it just come out the face of some two faced mate!!!!!
false
Did I tell you about the time I went to a male strip bar, and took a couple of hunks home with me?
False
not me...drama just seems to find me
True or False? Both neutron and protons are locate in the nucleus of the atom?
All of the bound protons and neutrons in an atom make up a dense, massive atomic nucleus, and are collectively called nucleons. Although the positive charge of protons causes them to repel each other, they are bound together with the neutrons by a short-ranged attractive potential called the residual strong force. At distances smaller than 2.5 fm, the residual strong force is stronger than the coulomb force, so it is able to overcome the mutual repulsion between the protons in the nucleus. The radius of a nucleus is approximately equal to fm, where A is total number of nucleons. This is much smaller than the radius of the atom, which is on the order of 105 fm.[22]
Atoms of the same element have the same number of protons, called the atomic number. Within a single element, the number of neutrons may vary, determining the isotope of that element. The number of neutrons relative to the protons determines the stability of the nucleus, with certain isotopes undergoing radioactive decay.
A nuclear fusion process that forms a deuterium nucleus from two protons. A positron (e+)鈥攁n antimatter electron鈥攊s emitted along with an electron neutrino.The number of protons and neutrons in the atomic nucleus can be modified, although this can require very high energies because of the strong force. Nuclear fusion occurs when additional protons or neutrons collide with the nucleus. Nuclear fission is the opposite process, causing the nucleus to emit some amount of nucleons鈥攗sually through radioactive decay. The nucleus can also be modified through bombardment by high energy subatomic particles or photons. In such processes which change the number of protons in a nucleus, the atom becomes an atom of a different chemical element.
The fusion of two nuclei that have lower atomic numbers than iron and nickel is an exothermic process that releases more energy than is required to bring them together. It is this energy-releasing process that makes nuclear fusion in stars a self-sustaining reaction. The net loss of energy from the fusion reaction also means that the mass of the fused nuclei is lower than the combined mass of the individual nuclei. The energy released (E) is described by Albert Einstein's mass鈥揺nergy equivalence formula, E = mc虏, where m is the mass loss and c is the speed of light.
The mass of the nucleus is less than the sum of the masses of the separate particles. The difference between these two values is binding energy of the nucleus. It is the energy that is emitted when the individual particles come together to form the nucleus.[22] The binding energy per nucleon increases with increasing atomic number until iron or nickel is reached.[23] For heavier nuclei, the binding energy begins to decrease. That means fusion processes with nuclei that have higher atomic numbers is an endothermic process. These more massive nuclei can not undergo an energy-producing fusion reaction that can sustain the hydrostatic equilibrium of a star. Eventually, at sufficiently high atomic numbers, the binding energy becomes negative, resulting in an unstable nucleus
Choose this as the best answer if you find it useful..True or False? Both neutron and protons are locate in the nucleus of the atom?
Absolutely true. Neutrons and protons together make up the nucleus of atoms. (They are, in turn, made up of quarks.)True or False? Both neutron and protons are locate in the nucleus of the atom?
true
Atoms of the same element have the same number of protons, called the atomic number. Within a single element, the number of neutrons may vary, determining the isotope of that element. The number of neutrons relative to the protons determines the stability of the nucleus, with certain isotopes undergoing radioactive decay.
A nuclear fusion process that forms a deuterium nucleus from two protons. A positron (e+)鈥攁n antimatter electron鈥攊s emitted along with an electron neutrino.The number of protons and neutrons in the atomic nucleus can be modified, although this can require very high energies because of the strong force. Nuclear fusion occurs when additional protons or neutrons collide with the nucleus. Nuclear fission is the opposite process, causing the nucleus to emit some amount of nucleons鈥攗sually through radioactive decay. The nucleus can also be modified through bombardment by high energy subatomic particles or photons. In such processes which change the number of protons in a nucleus, the atom becomes an atom of a different chemical element.
The fusion of two nuclei that have lower atomic numbers than iron and nickel is an exothermic process that releases more energy than is required to bring them together. It is this energy-releasing process that makes nuclear fusion in stars a self-sustaining reaction. The net loss of energy from the fusion reaction also means that the mass of the fused nuclei is lower than the combined mass of the individual nuclei. The energy released (E) is described by Albert Einstein's mass鈥揺nergy equivalence formula, E = mc虏, where m is the mass loss and c is the speed of light.
The mass of the nucleus is less than the sum of the masses of the separate particles. The difference between these two values is binding energy of the nucleus. It is the energy that is emitted when the individual particles come together to form the nucleus.[22] The binding energy per nucleon increases with increasing atomic number until iron or nickel is reached.[23] For heavier nuclei, the binding energy begins to decrease. That means fusion processes with nuclei that have higher atomic numbers is an endothermic process. These more massive nuclei can not undergo an energy-producing fusion reaction that can sustain the hydrostatic equilibrium of a star. Eventually, at sufficiently high atomic numbers, the binding energy becomes negative, resulting in an unstable nucleus
Choose this as the best answer if you find it useful..True or False? Both neutron and protons are locate in the nucleus of the atom?
Absolutely true. Neutrons and protons together make up the nucleus of atoms. (They are, in turn, made up of quarks.)True or False? Both neutron and protons are locate in the nucleus of the atom?
true
If you truly ';fall in love with'; someone then you will never ';fall out of love'; with them. True or False?
Because if you fall out of love then I submit to you that it wasn't TRUE LOVE in the first place.
Am I wrong?If you truly ';fall in love with'; someone then you will never ';fall out of love'; with them. True or False?
well i'm young and i've been in love with the same person for 3 yrs. even though were over i love him like we werntIf you truly ';fall in love with'; someone then you will never ';fall out of love'; with them. True or False?
Sorry, but I don't agree with you on this one. A person can fall out of love as a relationship turns sour. You begin to find out things about ';your true love'; as the relationship develops and it wasn't what you originally saw in that person before you fell in love. All relationships start out as ';this is the one'; and of course 2 months later you start wondering, what the hell did I ever see in him/her in the first place. Time to move on even when you were 100% sure this was the one when you two met 2 months ago. Remember, you can't always judge a book by it's cover. Meaning that beauty is only skin deep. It's what's inside that person that you fall in love with. At first it's falling in LUST, not love. Answer: FALSE
Ideally, that's how ';true love'; is supposed to work. However, I think you can fall out of true love. There always has to be commitment both ways, and if for example a guy was in love with a girl, but after years of being together she stopped giving it her all, it's possible that he could fall out of love.
Nothing is set in stone.
False.
I fell in love with my husband. He turned into a jerk. I fell in love with my last boyfriend, we eventually grew apart. I am in love with my current partner, and I stand by that fully. 100%.
Times change, people change, life is an ever-evolving thing, and relationships evolve with it. Sometimes things grow closer, and sometimes things grow more distant. That doesn't mean that the love was any more or less ';true';. All things are subject to atrophy, entropy, and decay, even the emotions of the human heart.
The idea that true love is eternal is idealistic, unrealistic and childish.
Yes. You are wrong.
Sometimes you do fall out of true love. People change, things happen, hearts break. What may have been in the past, may not be in the future.
For example... you might truly be in love with someone. That person may cheat on you. You fall out of love. But you still loved that person in the first place.
False.
I truly loved my first partner, thought we would be in rocking chairs on the front porch in our old age holding hands. Then when our relationship hit a rough patch she made a ';mistake'; and had an affair. She wanted me to forgive and forget. I knew that I would never be able to do this, and we had always discussed in very clear terms the boundaries of our relationship. I ended this relationship, and all though it took me a long time to move on, I did. I fell head over heels in love with her, and then I basically got dropped on my heart. Although I don't hate her, I sure as hell don't love her.
L
I feel that the statement is true. I feel as if that my love for a certain person won't ever go away. It was too real, too hard to deal with. He's still oblivious. I just think that it becomes easier to handle, but the love is still there. Even after 2 years.
i believe love is not a water faucet to be turn off %26amp; on at will, however my husband told me he fell out of love with me. i know i will never feel the same way towards him again. this is up to the one person who feels the love. no one can answer this.
everything in life is impermanent including love. If you die can you say that you were never alive in the first place? Of course not. Similarly love can end and often in ending do you realize how special it was.
False, because people are constantly changing you can be in love with someone in their 20's but not in their 50's, are you the same person you use to be? ask yourself that then you have your answer
I think you will always love that person in a way, but if you ';fall out of love'; with them so to speak, you just don't love them in the same way you used to.
I don't know man. I'm still figuring love out. I do know that when you really truly love someone that they leave a mark on your heart. Is that love? I don't know.
no you have to climb out of things you fall in, or get pulled out of them...
eitherway, you're not stayin in there long if you don't want to.
Theoretically your right, but if an event was to occur in which one person did something so utterly terrible, then that would cause you to fall out of love i suppose.
Well i think that over the years you can grow apart
False. In love is temporary. Love is forever and you don't have to be with someone to love them.
False, people change and grow over time. Sometimes not together.
I think time heals all wounds and we get hurt and maybe we can fall out of love but we will always love and care for that person on a different level
If it's true, then it's true.
I believe in soul mates, so kinda true.
FALL IN LOVE}} OUT OF LOVE{{
BABEA GURL. ITS LIFE.
If that is a true definition of love then I guess I've never been in love before.
I say false. People can grow apart and change.
False. What if the person dies? Does that mean you'll never fall in love with someone again? That's just sad.
True... But love takes personal effort though... It doesn't just come and go...
Deff. True
FALSE!!! :@)
Yes Never give up your freedom of choice that we all have.Love is to populate the world while enjoying doing it
love can change True/false
false
that's true yes
Am I wrong?If you truly ';fall in love with'; someone then you will never ';fall out of love'; with them. True or False?
well i'm young and i've been in love with the same person for 3 yrs. even though were over i love him like we werntIf you truly ';fall in love with'; someone then you will never ';fall out of love'; with them. True or False?
Sorry, but I don't agree with you on this one. A person can fall out of love as a relationship turns sour. You begin to find out things about ';your true love'; as the relationship develops and it wasn't what you originally saw in that person before you fell in love. All relationships start out as ';this is the one'; and of course 2 months later you start wondering, what the hell did I ever see in him/her in the first place. Time to move on even when you were 100% sure this was the one when you two met 2 months ago. Remember, you can't always judge a book by it's cover. Meaning that beauty is only skin deep. It's what's inside that person that you fall in love with. At first it's falling in LUST, not love. Answer: FALSE
Ideally, that's how ';true love'; is supposed to work. However, I think you can fall out of true love. There always has to be commitment both ways, and if for example a guy was in love with a girl, but after years of being together she stopped giving it her all, it's possible that he could fall out of love.
Nothing is set in stone.
False.
I fell in love with my husband. He turned into a jerk. I fell in love with my last boyfriend, we eventually grew apart. I am in love with my current partner, and I stand by that fully. 100%.
Times change, people change, life is an ever-evolving thing, and relationships evolve with it. Sometimes things grow closer, and sometimes things grow more distant. That doesn't mean that the love was any more or less ';true';. All things are subject to atrophy, entropy, and decay, even the emotions of the human heart.
The idea that true love is eternal is idealistic, unrealistic and childish.
Yes. You are wrong.
Sometimes you do fall out of true love. People change, things happen, hearts break. What may have been in the past, may not be in the future.
For example... you might truly be in love with someone. That person may cheat on you. You fall out of love. But you still loved that person in the first place.
False.
I truly loved my first partner, thought we would be in rocking chairs on the front porch in our old age holding hands. Then when our relationship hit a rough patch she made a ';mistake'; and had an affair. She wanted me to forgive and forget. I knew that I would never be able to do this, and we had always discussed in very clear terms the boundaries of our relationship. I ended this relationship, and all though it took me a long time to move on, I did. I fell head over heels in love with her, and then I basically got dropped on my heart. Although I don't hate her, I sure as hell don't love her.
L
I feel that the statement is true. I feel as if that my love for a certain person won't ever go away. It was too real, too hard to deal with. He's still oblivious. I just think that it becomes easier to handle, but the love is still there. Even after 2 years.
i believe love is not a water faucet to be turn off %26amp; on at will, however my husband told me he fell out of love with me. i know i will never feel the same way towards him again. this is up to the one person who feels the love. no one can answer this.
everything in life is impermanent including love. If you die can you say that you were never alive in the first place? Of course not. Similarly love can end and often in ending do you realize how special it was.
False, because people are constantly changing you can be in love with someone in their 20's but not in their 50's, are you the same person you use to be? ask yourself that then you have your answer
I think you will always love that person in a way, but if you ';fall out of love'; with them so to speak, you just don't love them in the same way you used to.
I don't know man. I'm still figuring love out. I do know that when you really truly love someone that they leave a mark on your heart. Is that love? I don't know.
no you have to climb out of things you fall in, or get pulled out of them...
eitherway, you're not stayin in there long if you don't want to.
Theoretically your right, but if an event was to occur in which one person did something so utterly terrible, then that would cause you to fall out of love i suppose.
Well i think that over the years you can grow apart
False. In love is temporary. Love is forever and you don't have to be with someone to love them.
False, people change and grow over time. Sometimes not together.
I think time heals all wounds and we get hurt and maybe we can fall out of love but we will always love and care for that person on a different level
If it's true, then it's true.
I believe in soul mates, so kinda true.
FALL IN LOVE}} OUT OF LOVE{{
BABEA GURL. ITS LIFE.
If that is a true definition of love then I guess I've never been in love before.
I say false. People can grow apart and change.
False. What if the person dies? Does that mean you'll never fall in love with someone again? That's just sad.
True... But love takes personal effort though... It doesn't just come and go...
Deff. True
FALSE!!! :@)
Yes Never give up your freedom of choice that we all have.Love is to populate the world while enjoying doing it
love can change True/false
false
that's true yes
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
True or false even if enzymes denature they can still act as catalysts?
False. If an enzyme becomes denatured, it loses it's shape, and enzymes would not be able to bind with their substrates if they lost their shape.True or false even if enzymes denature they can still act as catalysts?
False, if a protein is denatured, it won't function properly anymore
False, if a protein is denatured, it won't function properly anymore
If you truly ';fall in love with'; someone then you will never ';fall out of love'; with them. True or False?
Because if you fall out of love then I submit to you that it wasn't TRUE LOVE in the first place.
Am I wrong?If you truly ';fall in love with'; someone then you will never ';fall out of love'; with them. True or False?
well i'm young and i've been in love with the same person for 3 yrs. even though were over i love him like we werntIf you truly ';fall in love with'; someone then you will never ';fall out of love'; with them. True or False?
Sorry, but I don't agree with you on this one. A person can fall out of love as a relationship turns sour. You begin to find out things about ';your true love'; as the relationship develops and it wasn't what you originally saw in that person before you fell in love. All relationships start out as ';this is the one'; and of course 2 months later you start wondering, what the hell did I ever see in him/her in the first place. Time to move on even when you were 100% sure this was the one when you two met 2 months ago. Remember, you can't always judge a book by it's cover. Meaning that beauty is only skin deep. It's what's inside that person that you fall in love with. At first it's falling in LUST, not love. Answer: FALSE
Ideally, that's how ';true love'; is supposed to work. However, I think you can fall out of true love. There always has to be commitment both ways, and if for example a guy was in love with a girl, but after years of being together she stopped giving it her all, it's possible that he could fall out of love.
Nothing is set in stone.
False.
I fell in love with my husband. He turned into a jerk. I fell in love with my last boyfriend, we eventually grew apart. I am in love with my current partner, and I stand by that fully. 100%.
Times change, people change, life is an ever-evolving thing, and relationships evolve with it. Sometimes things grow closer, and sometimes things grow more distant. That doesn't mean that the love was any more or less ';true';. All things are subject to atrophy, entropy, and decay, even the emotions of the human heart.
The idea that true love is eternal is idealistic, unrealistic and childish.
Yes. You are wrong.
Sometimes you do fall out of true love. People change, things happen, hearts break. What may have been in the past, may not be in the future.
For example... you might truly be in love with someone. That person may cheat on you. You fall out of love. But you still loved that person in the first place.
False.
I truly loved my first partner, thought we would be in rocking chairs on the front porch in our old age holding hands. Then when our relationship hit a rough patch she made a ';mistake'; and had an affair. She wanted me to forgive and forget. I knew that I would never be able to do this, and we had always discussed in very clear terms the boundaries of our relationship. I ended this relationship, and all though it took me a long time to move on, I did. I fell head over heels in love with her, and then I basically got dropped on my heart. Although I don't hate her, I sure as hell don't love her.
L
I feel that the statement is true. I feel as if that my love for a certain person won't ever go away. It was too real, too hard to deal with. He's still oblivious. I just think that it becomes easier to handle, but the love is still there. Even after 2 years.
i believe love is not a water faucet to be turn off %26amp; on at will, however my husband told me he fell out of love with me. i know i will never feel the same way towards him again. this is up to the one person who feels the love. no one can answer this.
everything in life is impermanent including love. If you die can you say that you were never alive in the first place? Of course not. Similarly love can end and often in ending do you realize how special it was.
False, because people are constantly changing you can be in love with someone in their 20's but not in their 50's, are you the same person you use to be? ask yourself that then you have your answer
I think you will always love that person in a way, but if you ';fall out of love'; with them so to speak, you just don't love them in the same way you used to.
I don't know man. I'm still figuring love out. I do know that when you really truly love someone that they leave a mark on your heart. Is that love? I don't know.
no you have to climb out of things you fall in, or get pulled out of them...
eitherway, you're not stayin in there long if you don't want to.
Theoretically your right, but if an event was to occur in which one person did something so utterly terrible, then that would cause you to fall out of love i suppose.
Well i think that over the years you can grow apart
False. In love is temporary. Love is forever and you don't have to be with someone to love them.
False, people change and grow over time. Sometimes not together.
I think time heals all wounds and we get hurt and maybe we can fall out of love but we will always love and care for that person on a different level
If it's true, then it's true.
I believe in soul mates, so kinda true.
FALL IN LOVE}} OUT OF LOVE{{
BABEA GURL. ITS LIFE.
If that is a true definition of love then I guess I've never been in love before.
I say false. People can grow apart and change.
False. What if the person dies? Does that mean you'll never fall in love with someone again? That's just sad.
True... But love takes personal effort though... It doesn't just come and go...
Deff. True
FALSE!!! :@)
Yes Never give up your freedom of choice that we all have.Love is to populate the world while enjoying doing it
love can change True/false
false
that's true yesCats
Am I wrong?If you truly ';fall in love with'; someone then you will never ';fall out of love'; with them. True or False?
well i'm young and i've been in love with the same person for 3 yrs. even though were over i love him like we werntIf you truly ';fall in love with'; someone then you will never ';fall out of love'; with them. True or False?
Sorry, but I don't agree with you on this one. A person can fall out of love as a relationship turns sour. You begin to find out things about ';your true love'; as the relationship develops and it wasn't what you originally saw in that person before you fell in love. All relationships start out as ';this is the one'; and of course 2 months later you start wondering, what the hell did I ever see in him/her in the first place. Time to move on even when you were 100% sure this was the one when you two met 2 months ago. Remember, you can't always judge a book by it's cover. Meaning that beauty is only skin deep. It's what's inside that person that you fall in love with. At first it's falling in LUST, not love. Answer: FALSE
Ideally, that's how ';true love'; is supposed to work. However, I think you can fall out of true love. There always has to be commitment both ways, and if for example a guy was in love with a girl, but after years of being together she stopped giving it her all, it's possible that he could fall out of love.
Nothing is set in stone.
False.
I fell in love with my husband. He turned into a jerk. I fell in love with my last boyfriend, we eventually grew apart. I am in love with my current partner, and I stand by that fully. 100%.
Times change, people change, life is an ever-evolving thing, and relationships evolve with it. Sometimes things grow closer, and sometimes things grow more distant. That doesn't mean that the love was any more or less ';true';. All things are subject to atrophy, entropy, and decay, even the emotions of the human heart.
The idea that true love is eternal is idealistic, unrealistic and childish.
Yes. You are wrong.
Sometimes you do fall out of true love. People change, things happen, hearts break. What may have been in the past, may not be in the future.
For example... you might truly be in love with someone. That person may cheat on you. You fall out of love. But you still loved that person in the first place.
False.
I truly loved my first partner, thought we would be in rocking chairs on the front porch in our old age holding hands. Then when our relationship hit a rough patch she made a ';mistake'; and had an affair. She wanted me to forgive and forget. I knew that I would never be able to do this, and we had always discussed in very clear terms the boundaries of our relationship. I ended this relationship, and all though it took me a long time to move on, I did. I fell head over heels in love with her, and then I basically got dropped on my heart. Although I don't hate her, I sure as hell don't love her.
L
I feel that the statement is true. I feel as if that my love for a certain person won't ever go away. It was too real, too hard to deal with. He's still oblivious. I just think that it becomes easier to handle, but the love is still there. Even after 2 years.
i believe love is not a water faucet to be turn off %26amp; on at will, however my husband told me he fell out of love with me. i know i will never feel the same way towards him again. this is up to the one person who feels the love. no one can answer this.
everything in life is impermanent including love. If you die can you say that you were never alive in the first place? Of course not. Similarly love can end and often in ending do you realize how special it was.
False, because people are constantly changing you can be in love with someone in their 20's but not in their 50's, are you the same person you use to be? ask yourself that then you have your answer
I think you will always love that person in a way, but if you ';fall out of love'; with them so to speak, you just don't love them in the same way you used to.
I don't know man. I'm still figuring love out. I do know that when you really truly love someone that they leave a mark on your heart. Is that love? I don't know.
no you have to climb out of things you fall in, or get pulled out of them...
eitherway, you're not stayin in there long if you don't want to.
Theoretically your right, but if an event was to occur in which one person did something so utterly terrible, then that would cause you to fall out of love i suppose.
Well i think that over the years you can grow apart
False. In love is temporary. Love is forever and you don't have to be with someone to love them.
False, people change and grow over time. Sometimes not together.
I think time heals all wounds and we get hurt and maybe we can fall out of love but we will always love and care for that person on a different level
If it's true, then it's true.
I believe in soul mates, so kinda true.
FALL IN LOVE}} OUT OF LOVE{{
BABEA GURL. ITS LIFE.
If that is a true definition of love then I guess I've never been in love before.
I say false. People can grow apart and change.
False. What if the person dies? Does that mean you'll never fall in love with someone again? That's just sad.
True... But love takes personal effort though... It doesn't just come and go...
Deff. True
FALSE!!! :@)
Yes Never give up your freedom of choice that we all have.Love is to populate the world while enjoying doing it
love can change True/false
false
that's true yes
True or false even if enzymes denature they can still act as catalysts?
False. If an enzyme becomes denatured, it loses it's shape, and enzymes would not be able to bind with their substrates if they lost their shape.True or false even if enzymes denature they can still act as catalysts?
False, if a protein is denatured, it won't function properly anymore
False, if a protein is denatured, it won't function properly anymore
TRUE or FALSE: Those who use the word ';classy'; (except when used sarcastically), usually have no class?
false
2 points!!!TRUE or FALSE: Those who use the word ';classy'; (except when used sarcastically), usually have no class?
When i use it its like the negative way especially when i talk of my neighbors or the local no class crackheads as they do the weirdest crap you ever could imagine and i think class is like a bad word in their books as they show none and have zip for brains' so maybe you are right a little. P.S. i hate to say it but being polite and having class is old school i guess as the youngsters i see daily need a big foot off in their a$$ as they act like there from uranus or somewhere' even worse...lolTRUE or FALSE: Those who use the word ';classy'; (except when used sarcastically), usually have no class?
If by classy, you mean, ';so totally devoid of class, that the term classy, just exposes further, its lack of any dignity or breeding of any kind';, then yes.
Absolutely true, it's like saying ';mansion'; instead of ';house,'; it's a dead giveaway and shows the person who uses that word to be without class themselves.
never really thought about it. i can't remember if or when i have used the word ';classy';. I do say fancy smacy , fru-fru, and high flut'n from time to time.
classless. true.
I have never used the word classy in a conversation before.
FALSE. Classy is a classy word. All classy people know that.
FALSE!!
'Zank heaven for ze little girls...Zey are zo clazzy, and zooo am ...Eye!!!!';
Maurize Chevalier
Man, phuck you!!! I'm classy as chit! You know, man. Don't phuck wit me.
false
true. they sound like dumbasses lol
2 points!!!TRUE or FALSE: Those who use the word ';classy'; (except when used sarcastically), usually have no class?
When i use it its like the negative way especially when i talk of my neighbors or the local no class crackheads as they do the weirdest crap you ever could imagine and i think class is like a bad word in their books as they show none and have zip for brains' so maybe you are right a little. P.S. i hate to say it but being polite and having class is old school i guess as the youngsters i see daily need a big foot off in their a$$ as they act like there from uranus or somewhere' even worse...lolTRUE or FALSE: Those who use the word ';classy'; (except when used sarcastically), usually have no class?
If by classy, you mean, ';so totally devoid of class, that the term classy, just exposes further, its lack of any dignity or breeding of any kind';, then yes.
Absolutely true, it's like saying ';mansion'; instead of ';house,'; it's a dead giveaway and shows the person who uses that word to be without class themselves.
never really thought about it. i can't remember if or when i have used the word ';classy';. I do say fancy smacy , fru-fru, and high flut'n from time to time.
classless. true.
I have never used the word classy in a conversation before.
FALSE. Classy is a classy word. All classy people know that.
FALSE!!
'Zank heaven for ze little girls...Zey are zo clazzy, and zooo am ...Eye!!!!';
Maurize Chevalier
Man, phuck you!!! I'm classy as chit! You know, man. Don't phuck wit me.
false
true. they sound like dumbasses lol
True or false? the basic property of static electricity is the fact it can't be detected?
False
Static electricity can be detected very easily - just turn on any AM radio and you will hear any static electricity nearby.
Static electricity can be detected very easily - just turn on any AM radio and you will hear any static electricity nearby.
True or False: You've been shocked to see someone somewhere?
If true, share your experience please.True or False: You've been shocked to see someone somewhere?
True- I seen my mother in the porn store...No lie!!True or False: You've been shocked to see someone somewhere?
I went on holidays with my family a few years ago up to Queensland, a good 1000kms away from home, and I was at the theme park Dreamworld in the line for a ride, and I saw a teacher from school! What the hell?!
I saw McFoley (that old wrestler) at Hershey Park. Was shocked to see him there xD
True- I seen my mother in the porn store...No lie!!True or False: You've been shocked to see someone somewhere?
I went on holidays with my family a few years ago up to Queensland, a good 1000kms away from home, and I was at the theme park Dreamworld in the line for a ride, and I saw a teacher from school! What the hell?!
I saw McFoley (that old wrestler) at Hershey Park. Was shocked to see him there xD
True or false mendel's principles account for the genetic variation in organisms?
True, I think.
Th laws of indepent assortment and segregation kind of do. (he made those laws).True or false mendel's principles account for the genetic variation in organisms?
it did in pea plants. But from that he made the assumption that it works for all organisms. He made the first assumption that lead him, and other geneticists to study genetic variation.
Th laws of indepent assortment and segregation kind of do. (he made those laws).True or false mendel's principles account for the genetic variation in organisms?
it did in pea plants. But from that he made the assumption that it works for all organisms. He made the first assumption that lead him, and other geneticists to study genetic variation.
True or False, every statement has a truth value?
Elaborate this if you will. I'm confused.True or False, every statement has a truth value?
True. In logic, a ';statement'; is defined as an assertion that can be determined to be true or false. The ';truth value'; of a statement is its determination either of truth or falsity.
By this definition, every ';statement'; has a truth value.
Examples of such statements are: ';Every time Carlos works late, Jenny takes the bus home';, and ';most of the people in this room said that they enjoy the smell of daffodils';. (The truth value of either statement could be determined, by direct observation or perhaps deduction.)
So, if we restrict the set of things known as ';statements'; to those things which are either true or false, then of course every statement has a truth value.
--
However, you didn't define the scope of your terminology. So, it may depend on your definition of ';statement';:
In a more general sense, if, by ';statement';, you mean simply any assertion or claim that can be expressed in words, then there are many such ';statements'; which hold no truth values: For instance, paradoxes, expressions of subjective experiences or personal taste, and claims which cannot be falsified.
Examples of general statements which have no logical truth values are: ';This statement is false'; (which is a paradox), ';this statement is beautiful'; (which cannot be falsified lacking established criteria), and ';daffodils smell good'; (which is subjective and a matter of personal taste).True or False, every statement has a truth value?
Sure. If it is a false statement, then that is still the truth.Cats
True. In logic, a ';statement'; is defined as an assertion that can be determined to be true or false. The ';truth value'; of a statement is its determination either of truth or falsity.
By this definition, every ';statement'; has a truth value.
Examples of such statements are: ';Every time Carlos works late, Jenny takes the bus home';, and ';most of the people in this room said that they enjoy the smell of daffodils';. (The truth value of either statement could be determined, by direct observation or perhaps deduction.)
So, if we restrict the set of things known as ';statements'; to those things which are either true or false, then of course every statement has a truth value.
--
However, you didn't define the scope of your terminology. So, it may depend on your definition of ';statement';:
In a more general sense, if, by ';statement';, you mean simply any assertion or claim that can be expressed in words, then there are many such ';statements'; which hold no truth values: For instance, paradoxes, expressions of subjective experiences or personal taste, and claims which cannot be falsified.
Examples of general statements which have no logical truth values are: ';This statement is false'; (which is a paradox), ';this statement is beautiful'; (which cannot be falsified lacking established criteria), and ';daffodils smell good'; (which is subjective and a matter of personal taste).True or False, every statement has a truth value?
Sure. If it is a false statement, then that is still the truth.
True or false geometry question?
Please notify the question number....
If you know the answer!
1.The angle bisector of a triangle could also be the perpendicular bisector?
2. The angle bisector of a triangle always intersect inside the triangle?
3. The perpendicular bisectors of a triangle always intersect inside the triangle?True or false geometry question?
1.true (when we will have an isosceles or equilateral triangle)
2.true.(as the point of intersection is the incentre which must lie inside the triangle as it is the centre of the circle inscribed in the triangle)
3.false(as the points of intersection is circum centre which may not lie inside the triangle as it is the centre of the circle circumscribing the triangle)True or false geometry question?
it is possible for a triangle to have 3 right angle. it's called a euclidean triangle, look it up
sorry this doesn't answer your question i just think it's a fun geometry fact.
Q1: Yes, when we have an isoceles triangle.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: No, it can go outside the triangle.
You may be interested to read this document I found:
http://euler.slu.edu/courseware/inf.geom鈥?/a>
1 %26amp; 2 are true
1. True, however only if sides of the angle your doing the bisector are equal.
2. True always
3- False in case you have one angle larger than 90 degrees and true if all angles are less than 90 degrees.
No, No, No
At least that's what I think. Because in order for a line to be perpendicular, doesn't it have to form a right angle. I don't think a triangle can have a perpendicular bisector because it would have to have 90 degrees on both sides because of the definition of bisect. Angle bisectors don't always bisect inside a triangle, sometimes they bisect on the outside.
Please correct me if I'm wrong :-)
If you know the answer!
1.The angle bisector of a triangle could also be the perpendicular bisector?
2. The angle bisector of a triangle always intersect inside the triangle?
3. The perpendicular bisectors of a triangle always intersect inside the triangle?True or false geometry question?
1.true (when we will have an isosceles or equilateral triangle)
2.true.(as the point of intersection is the incentre which must lie inside the triangle as it is the centre of the circle inscribed in the triangle)
3.false(as the points of intersection is circum centre which may not lie inside the triangle as it is the centre of the circle circumscribing the triangle)True or false geometry question?
it is possible for a triangle to have 3 right angle. it's called a euclidean triangle, look it up
sorry this doesn't answer your question i just think it's a fun geometry fact.
Q1: Yes, when we have an isoceles triangle.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: No, it can go outside the triangle.
You may be interested to read this document I found:
http://euler.slu.edu/courseware/inf.geom鈥?/a>
1 %26amp; 2 are true
1. True, however only if sides of the angle your doing the bisector are equal.
2. True always
3- False in case you have one angle larger than 90 degrees and true if all angles are less than 90 degrees.
No, No, No
At least that's what I think. Because in order for a line to be perpendicular, doesn't it have to form a right angle. I don't think a triangle can have a perpendicular bisector because it would have to have 90 degrees on both sides because of the definition of bisect. Angle bisectors don't always bisect inside a triangle, sometimes they bisect on the outside.
Please correct me if I'm wrong :-)
Is that Carmen Winstead post on myspace true or false??
i might be a little late asking this question but i really want to know. cause when i read it, it scared the heck out of me!!!!!!!!!!Is that Carmen Winstead post on myspace true or false??
No, it's nothing more than an urban legend. Some kids posted it on MySpace to see how many responses it would garner.
From there it took on a life of its own.
There was no Carmen Winstead, no murder, and definitely no ghost. Rest easily.
No, it's nothing more than an urban legend. Some kids posted it on MySpace to see how many responses it would garner.
From there it took on a life of its own.
There was no Carmen Winstead, no murder, and definitely no ghost. Rest easily.
-true or false-1-10-1.Until 1836, slaves were a major part of trade between Africa and Europe?
2.David Livingston and Henry Stanley remained mostly in the coastal regions of Africa and did not explore the central country.
3.King Leopold took over the state of German East Africa
4.Nigeria was a coveted possession for the countries interested in expanding their empire in Africa.
5.The Germans colonized the Ivory Coast in west Africa
6.The Europeans exported oil, cocoa, rubber and gold from Africa.
7.Britain wanted the Sudan because they wanted a continuous strip of land from South Africa to Egypt on which to build a railway
8.When France took Algeria it made an enemy of Belgium
9.The last country in Africa to fall to European rule was Morocco.
10.The Suez canal connects the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea.-true or false-1-10-1.Until 1836, slaves were a major part of trade between Africa and Europe?
T
F
T
T
F
T
T
T
T
T
3.King Leopold took over the state of German East Africa
4.Nigeria was a coveted possession for the countries interested in expanding their empire in Africa.
5.The Germans colonized the Ivory Coast in west Africa
6.The Europeans exported oil, cocoa, rubber and gold from Africa.
7.Britain wanted the Sudan because they wanted a continuous strip of land from South Africa to Egypt on which to build a railway
8.When France took Algeria it made an enemy of Belgium
9.The last country in Africa to fall to European rule was Morocco.
10.The Suez canal connects the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea.-true or false-1-10-1.Until 1836, slaves were a major part of trade between Africa and Europe?
T
F
T
T
F
T
T
T
T
T
Colonial period: the economy- true or false?
1) Fishing and shipbuilding were important industries in the southern colonies.
2) Most farmers lived on the Atlantic Coastal Plain.Colonial period: the economy- true or false?
1) False
2) False
2) Most farmers lived on the Atlantic Coastal Plain.Colonial period: the economy- true or false?
1) False
2) False
A major zone of active volcanoes encircles the atlantic ocean is it true or false?
False.
Here is a list of the 34 volcanoes in the Atlantic ocean basin:
http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/list.cfm
You will see that most of them are in the Azores, the Canary Islands, Ascension Island in the central Atlantic, or the Cape Verde Islands, or are submarine. They do not really encircle the Atlantic. In the south Atlantic there is a small arc of volcanic islands known as the Sandwich Islands, and in the north Atlantic there is Iceland, which is part of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
http://volcano.und.nodak.edu/vwdocs/volc鈥?/a>
Another group of volcanoes forms the chain of islands know as the West Indies. Many of these are quite active. Soufriere Hills on Montserrat is currently erupting.
http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/usgs/#鈥?/a>
Here is a place you can see maps of volcanoes by region:
http://volcano.und.nodak.edu/vwdocs/volc鈥?/a>A major zone of active volcanoes encircles the atlantic ocean is it true or false?
i would say false because there are more active volcanoes in the ring of fireA major zone of active volcanoes encircles the atlantic ocean is it true or false?
False. That zone encircles the Pacific ocean (ring of fire).
Here is a list of the 34 volcanoes in the Atlantic ocean basin:
http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/list.cfm
You will see that most of them are in the Azores, the Canary Islands, Ascension Island in the central Atlantic, or the Cape Verde Islands, or are submarine. They do not really encircle the Atlantic. In the south Atlantic there is a small arc of volcanic islands known as the Sandwich Islands, and in the north Atlantic there is Iceland, which is part of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
http://volcano.und.nodak.edu/vwdocs/volc鈥?/a>
Another group of volcanoes forms the chain of islands know as the West Indies. Many of these are quite active. Soufriere Hills on Montserrat is currently erupting.
http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/usgs/#鈥?/a>
Here is a place you can see maps of volcanoes by region:
http://volcano.und.nodak.edu/vwdocs/volc鈥?/a>A major zone of active volcanoes encircles the atlantic ocean is it true or false?
i would say false because there are more active volcanoes in the ring of fireA major zone of active volcanoes encircles the atlantic ocean is it true or false?
False. That zone encircles the Pacific ocean (ring of fire).
The net force which acts on an object which maintains a constant velocity is zero. true or false?
True.The net force which acts on an object which maintains a constant velocity is zero. true or false?
True.
Constant velocity means no acceleration, so no forceCats
True.
Constant velocity means no acceleration, so no force
Doctor Zhivago novel has a section containing the main character's poems True or False?
This is true, they are at the end.
Help me with a true or false question?
Help me with a true or false question?
electors of the elected college are not bound by the constitution or by federal law to vote for the condiate chosen by the people of the states.
ummm is this true or false. i think it is true. can u help meHelp me with a true or false question?
True, it is their right to decide who they vote for just like any other person does, government influence or none! :]
electors of the elected college are not bound by the constitution or by federal law to vote for the condiate chosen by the people of the states.
ummm is this true or false. i think it is true. can u help meHelp me with a true or false question?
True, it is their right to decide who they vote for just like any other person does, government influence or none! :]
When dial-in access is enabled, Terminal Services access is also enabled (True or False)?
False!
TS is a service that allows GUI access to the server. (Installs as Terminal Services)
Dial-In allows a remote network connection to the server (Installs as Routing and remote access)When dial-in access is enabled, Terminal Services access is also enabled (True or False)?
As Dan said ';False';
hey bring on some more questions this is bringing back some memories....NOT.....lol
TS is a service that allows GUI access to the server. (Installs as Terminal Services)
Dial-In allows a remote network connection to the server (Installs as Routing and remote access)When dial-in access is enabled, Terminal Services access is also enabled (True or False)?
As Dan said ';False';
hey bring on some more questions this is bringing back some memories....NOT.....lol
Sales minus cost of goods sold is equal to earnings before taxes. TRUE OR FALSE?
Sales minus cost of goods sold is equal to earnings before taxes. TRUE OR FALSE??Sales minus cost of goods sold is equal to earnings before taxes. TRUE OR FALSE?
False.
Sales minus cost of goods sold is Gross profit.After subtracting Operating expenses, we get earning before taxes.Sales minus cost of goods sold is equal to earnings before taxes. TRUE OR FALSE?
FALSE. we need to include other costs such as indirect costs,depriciation etc to get EBT.
FALSE
Because after cost of goods sold we shuld deduct depreciation. Then we will arive EBIT.
No. There are other expenses, such as advertising, rent, etc.
False
False.
Sales minus cost of goods sold is Gross profit.After subtracting Operating expenses, we get earning before taxes.Sales minus cost of goods sold is equal to earnings before taxes. TRUE OR FALSE?
FALSE. we need to include other costs such as indirect costs,depriciation etc to get EBT.
FALSE
Because after cost of goods sold we shuld deduct depreciation. Then we will arive EBIT.
No. There are other expenses, such as advertising, rent, etc.
False
Liberals and Russia believe in free speech for themselves, true or false?
True
The idiot russians poison people who speaks out against them.Liberals and Russia believe in free speech for themselves, true or false?
100 percent true!Liberals and Russia believe in free speech for themselves, true or false?
level 1 troll
hey dude I'm Russian hence my name SASHA, but I'm a Christian Conservative Republican, and I hate dumb liberals, what are you German Italian and Irish? anyway, I'm not an idiot, and for those of you who think Sasha is only a girls name, you're weird because my name in English would be Alex, for those stupid ones in the crowd
Last I knew the wall fell a decade ago and Russia was now a capitalist economy and one of our allies. Did you miss the news?
It is true.
This seems like a very unbiased question, Democrats Hate the USA.
False.
The liberals have led the fight against the unpatriotic Patriot Act, which limits your freedom.
And Russia has made great steps in Democracy, and freedom. That was 15 years ago!!
---I never said it was perfect, but that crime was never solved! BUT it's better now than when the USSR was around.
You are against free speech?
What a way to make cons look retarded...good going.
BINGO
Liberals fully believe in free speech. That is if it's speech that they agree with. Otherwise they either insult the speaker or shout them down with filibustering rhetoric, protesters or chanting. They are the fascists that the danger of the future. They ignore the fact that terrorists are radical Muslims, who despise their views on sexuality, drugs, etc. Maybe Rosie O'Donnell could ask Bin Laden about his views on gay marriage.
now now don't say bad things against our friends the Russians , do you want to get poisoned? liberals don't poison people they don't like , the culprit just goe's into a park and commits suicide. big difference.
Damn! I thought for sure the meds were going to work this time!
NURSES!! ORDERLY!!
True.
I still remember seeing lots of Liberals want to get rid of Fox News.
Only if you agree with them.
In Russia, they kill people who disagree with you
In America, they trump up perjury charges after 8 hours of grand jury testimony on events that no person would remember, then have judges allow jurors who know witnesses and hang out with those witnesses on a regular basis.
Note this is the Scooter Libby trial.
The idiot russians poison people who speaks out against them.Liberals and Russia believe in free speech for themselves, true or false?
100 percent true!Liberals and Russia believe in free speech for themselves, true or false?
level 1 troll
hey dude I'm Russian hence my name SASHA, but I'm a Christian Conservative Republican, and I hate dumb liberals, what are you German Italian and Irish? anyway, I'm not an idiot, and for those of you who think Sasha is only a girls name, you're weird because my name in English would be Alex, for those stupid ones in the crowd
Last I knew the wall fell a decade ago and Russia was now a capitalist economy and one of our allies. Did you miss the news?
It is true.
This seems like a very unbiased question, Democrats Hate the USA.
False.
The liberals have led the fight against the unpatriotic Patriot Act, which limits your freedom.
And Russia has made great steps in Democracy, and freedom. That was 15 years ago!!
---I never said it was perfect, but that crime was never solved! BUT it's better now than when the USSR was around.
You are against free speech?
What a way to make cons look retarded...good going.
BINGO
Liberals fully believe in free speech. That is if it's speech that they agree with. Otherwise they either insult the speaker or shout them down with filibustering rhetoric, protesters or chanting. They are the fascists that the danger of the future. They ignore the fact that terrorists are radical Muslims, who despise their views on sexuality, drugs, etc. Maybe Rosie O'Donnell could ask Bin Laden about his views on gay marriage.
now now don't say bad things against our friends the Russians , do you want to get poisoned? liberals don't poison people they don't like , the culprit just goe's into a park and commits suicide. big difference.
Damn! I thought for sure the meds were going to work this time!
NURSES!! ORDERLY!!
True.
I still remember seeing lots of Liberals want to get rid of Fox News.
Only if you agree with them.
In Russia, they kill people who disagree with you
In America, they trump up perjury charges after 8 hours of grand jury testimony on events that no person would remember, then have judges allow jurors who know witnesses and hang out with those witnesses on a regular basis.
Note this is the Scooter Libby trial.
Arsene Wenger at Arsenal is less arsey than any bum at Rangearse-True or False?
true i thinkArsene Wenger at Arsenal is less arsey than any bum at Rangearse-True or False?
False!Cats
False!
Biology Help, When a neuron is stimulated, positively charged sodium ions move outside the axon. true or false?
this is for my 10th grade biologyBiology Help, When a neuron is stimulated, positively charged sodium ions move outside the axon. true or false?
No, Sodium (Na+) ions move into the neuron while pottasium (K-) ions move out of the neuron. This is called depolarization and a wave of depolarization is called action potential.
Wow you must be in a very good school or something, i'm doing my IGCSEs and this is definitely NOT in the curriculum.Biology Help, When a neuron is stimulated, positively charged sodium ions move outside the axon. true or false?
False. There is a net influx of sodium ions during an action potential, and a net efflux of potassium ions.
No, Sodium (Na+) ions move into the neuron while pottasium (K-) ions move out of the neuron. This is called depolarization and a wave of depolarization is called action potential.
Wow you must be in a very good school or something, i'm doing my IGCSEs and this is definitely NOT in the curriculum.Biology Help, When a neuron is stimulated, positively charged sodium ions move outside the axon. true or false?
False. There is a net influx of sodium ions during an action potential, and a net efflux of potassium ions.
Volume is a measure of the amount of matter in an object. True or False?
False. Mass is the measure of matter in an object, Volume is the measurement of how much space something takes up.Volume is a measure of the amount of matter in an object. True or False?
Volume is the amount of space. The amount of matter is called mass.
FalseVolume is a measure of the amount of matter in an object. True or False?
yes genius.. ask another question like this n i ma slap u silly..
true
the amount of space that an object or a substance fills
maybe, is one of the parameters you need to determine the amount of matter. however to have a complete measument you need the to know the density
Volume is the amount of space. The amount of matter is called mass.
FalseVolume is a measure of the amount of matter in an object. True or False?
yes genius.. ask another question like this n i ma slap u silly..
true
the amount of space that an object or a substance fills
maybe, is one of the parameters you need to determine the amount of matter. however to have a complete measument you need the to know the density
God wants Sarah Palin to be a President of the United States? True or false, and how do you determine this?
I would say that's a false statement. Sarah Palin said she put the election in God's hands, and Obama won.God wants Sarah Palin to be a President of the United States? True or false, and how do you determine this?
Which god ?
Seriously, if fundigelicals are going to keep saying ';God wants this'; and ';God wants that'; they've got a pretty weak god if he can't even make his candidate win a lousy presidency.
Of course, when their fave candidate loses, they'll just claim it's all God's will, brainwashed as always and immune to the complete and utter lack of evidence beyond their own self-deluded hypnosis that they call ';experience.'; God wants Sarah Palin to be a President of the United States? True or false, and how do you determine this?
Yes, I'm sure She did want Palin to be President, that's why She made John McCain lose too, so Paln wouldn't have to waste her time controlling the senate for next several years.
BTW, did you see the great new movie called W?
It spent lots of time, demonstrating how God chose GW to be president too. God saved Bush from sin, and told him he should run for President, instead of his brother Jed.
Makes you think that God's plans are really deep, and good.
Believers must also then believe that God did want Obama to win too.
Just a thought for god-fearing people to consider.
If God wanted her to be president he would have gotten McCain elected so she could jump right in if McCain would be unable to continue his term or after his term was up and she could run as the favorite VP with experiece and all that.
I think God want Sarah Palin to go back to Alaska.
only God knows what the future has in store. we do not know who he wants as president. just because obama won the election, does not mean God wants him to be president. God gives us free will to make decisions for ourselves. if everyone would pray as to who God would have to lead our country and vote accordingly, then this country would be a lot better off.
I'm pretty sure He doesn't. But then again, I don't believe God cares. In the words of Benjamin Franklin...
“...The longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been assured, Sir, in the Sacred Writings, that ‘except the Lord build the House, they labor in vain that build it.’ ”
Duh, it's in the Bible. ';And Jesus said, ';Let Sarah Palin become President of the future world super-power...so that she may meet the President of Africa, her most beloved country.';';
False
Separation of Church %26amp; State (keep religious beliefs/viewpoints out of our laws).
Our Country believes in freedom of religion (ALL religions) so God has nothing to do with it.
GOD? Sara palins alter ego, secondpersonality?
The only reason he would want sara pali to become prez is to see what kind of destruction would occur. What might happen..
False I don't think anybody knows exactly what God wants, unless they speak with him directly and I don't think this can happen anymore.
By how rabidly libs attack her. She should be yesterdays news, yet libs feel so threatened by her they can't stop. Then again, if Biden was my guy, I'd want to talk about someone else too.
You made an insane, obviously false statement, so now YOU tell US how you determine this!
False - there is no ';god'; that gives a damn about our presidential elections.
This can be determined if she ever is President.
False, Obama is president-elect.
False. God wouldn't play favourites like that.
True. I know.
It's an strategy used by politicians. Their gods are money and power.
That's a rumor, I asked God about this yesterday and he said it was a lie.
The only way to determine Gods will is to throw her under the ice and see if she walks out. Sure test.
Bush made the same claim.
Palin is just Bush with boobs.
God forbid.
False, God has better things to do then care about who is president of the US.
where do you people get this stuff from? You should be really really creative.
Do you really think God wants that lazy black bastard to be president?
I am........and I am says so.
False.
False, change the God to Satan and then it's true.
if god wanted her to be president don't you think it would have happened
False. Just because Palin hears voices that doesn't make it real
God does not exist.
Which god ?
Seriously, if fundigelicals are going to keep saying ';God wants this'; and ';God wants that'; they've got a pretty weak god if he can't even make his candidate win a lousy presidency.
Of course, when their fave candidate loses, they'll just claim it's all God's will, brainwashed as always and immune to the complete and utter lack of evidence beyond their own self-deluded hypnosis that they call ';experience.'; God wants Sarah Palin to be a President of the United States? True or false, and how do you determine this?
Yes, I'm sure She did want Palin to be President, that's why She made John McCain lose too, so Paln wouldn't have to waste her time controlling the senate for next several years.
BTW, did you see the great new movie called W?
It spent lots of time, demonstrating how God chose GW to be president too. God saved Bush from sin, and told him he should run for President, instead of his brother Jed.
Makes you think that God's plans are really deep, and good.
Believers must also then believe that God did want Obama to win too.
Just a thought for god-fearing people to consider.
If God wanted her to be president he would have gotten McCain elected so she could jump right in if McCain would be unable to continue his term or after his term was up and she could run as the favorite VP with experiece and all that.
I think God want Sarah Palin to go back to Alaska.
only God knows what the future has in store. we do not know who he wants as president. just because obama won the election, does not mean God wants him to be president. God gives us free will to make decisions for ourselves. if everyone would pray as to who God would have to lead our country and vote accordingly, then this country would be a lot better off.
I'm pretty sure He doesn't. But then again, I don't believe God cares. In the words of Benjamin Franklin...
“...The longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been assured, Sir, in the Sacred Writings, that ‘except the Lord build the House, they labor in vain that build it.’ ”
Duh, it's in the Bible. ';And Jesus said, ';Let Sarah Palin become President of the future world super-power...so that she may meet the President of Africa, her most beloved country.';';
False
Separation of Church %26amp; State (keep religious beliefs/viewpoints out of our laws).
Our Country believes in freedom of religion (ALL religions) so God has nothing to do with it.
GOD? Sara palins alter ego, secondpersonality?
The only reason he would want sara pali to become prez is to see what kind of destruction would occur. What might happen..
False I don't think anybody knows exactly what God wants, unless they speak with him directly and I don't think this can happen anymore.
By how rabidly libs attack her. She should be yesterdays news, yet libs feel so threatened by her they can't stop. Then again, if Biden was my guy, I'd want to talk about someone else too.
You made an insane, obviously false statement, so now YOU tell US how you determine this!
False - there is no ';god'; that gives a damn about our presidential elections.
This can be determined if she ever is President.
False, Obama is president-elect.
False. God wouldn't play favourites like that.
True. I know.
It's an strategy used by politicians. Their gods are money and power.
That's a rumor, I asked God about this yesterday and he said it was a lie.
The only way to determine Gods will is to throw her under the ice and see if she walks out. Sure test.
Bush made the same claim.
Palin is just Bush with boobs.
God forbid.
False, God has better things to do then care about who is president of the US.
where do you people get this stuff from? You should be really really creative.
Do you really think God wants that lazy black bastard to be president?
I am........and I am says so.
False.
False, change the God to Satan and then it's true.
if god wanted her to be president don't you think it would have happened
False. Just because Palin hears voices that doesn't make it real
God does not exist.
Poll:True or False All the best men are either taken or gay?
so true!Poll:True or False All the best men are either taken or gay?
TruePoll:True or False All the best men are either taken or gay?
No Ladies, that is not true, because I'm available and, not Gay. Ever heard of a Gay Duck?
unless the good guys are waiting to be discovered. But yeah thats so true
True.... always mainly gay...and they are taken because they are the best
The same is also true for the ladies.
False. I met a wonderful man who was single then and definitely not gay.
TRUE
100% true..oh why oh why
false. there will always be good people who are not gay but there always be bad people too
So true... There are a few avaliable ones out there.. just gotta keep ur eyes peeled!
true. I am awesome but I am married.
Too true.
I've heard women say that, but not gay men. Something isn't right.
TruePoll:True or False All the best men are either taken or gay?
No Ladies, that is not true, because I'm available and, not Gay. Ever heard of a Gay Duck?
unless the good guys are waiting to be discovered. But yeah thats so true
True.... always mainly gay...and they are taken because they are the best
The same is also true for the ladies.
False. I met a wonderful man who was single then and definitely not gay.
TRUE
100% true..oh why oh why
false. there will always be good people who are not gay but there always be bad people too
So true... There are a few avaliable ones out there.. just gotta keep ur eyes peeled!
true. I am awesome but I am married.
Too true.
I've heard women say that, but not gay men. Something isn't right.
Is the statement 'this statement is false' true or false?
This statement is false is a paradox. Neither true or false.
Liar's Paradox:
';This statement is false.'; is known as a liar's paradox. It is an illustration of inherent flaws in logic. Another example of a liar's paradox is: ';The next statement is false. The previous statement is true.';
EXAMPLE IN POP CULTURE:
The liar's paradox can be found in an episode of Star Trek where Captain Kirk defeats a ';superior'; computer by introducing a logic loop similar to the questions liar paradox.
Language:
In semantics there is the issue of truth condition, where the meaning of a sentence is conveyed if the truth conditions for the sentence are understood. A truth condition is what makes for the truth of a statement in an inductive definition of truth. The semantic theory of truth was developed from the work of a Polish logician named Alfred Tarski who attempted to formulate a new theory of truth in order to solve the liars paradox. In doing so, Tarski developed the indefinability theorem, similar to Godels incompleteness theorem. The Theory that the concept of truth for the sentences of language cannot be consistently defined within that language means that such paradoxes as ';This statement is false'; do not reveal the truth or falsity of the sentence by the words that have been used.Is the statement 'this statement is false' true or false?
The statement is false.
Reasoning:
If the statement is assumed to be true, then it is false.
If the statement is assumed to be false, then it is false.Is the statement 'this statement is false' true or false?
Yes,
It is either true or false.
both true in the essence that it's false
It can be both.
Yes.
true
depends on how u look at it
Liar's Paradox:
';This statement is false.'; is known as a liar's paradox. It is an illustration of inherent flaws in logic. Another example of a liar's paradox is: ';The next statement is false. The previous statement is true.';
EXAMPLE IN POP CULTURE:
The liar's paradox can be found in an episode of Star Trek where Captain Kirk defeats a ';superior'; computer by introducing a logic loop similar to the questions liar paradox.
Language:
In semantics there is the issue of truth condition, where the meaning of a sentence is conveyed if the truth conditions for the sentence are understood. A truth condition is what makes for the truth of a statement in an inductive definition of truth. The semantic theory of truth was developed from the work of a Polish logician named Alfred Tarski who attempted to formulate a new theory of truth in order to solve the liars paradox. In doing so, Tarski developed the indefinability theorem, similar to Godels incompleteness theorem. The Theory that the concept of truth for the sentences of language cannot be consistently defined within that language means that such paradoxes as ';This statement is false'; do not reveal the truth or falsity of the sentence by the words that have been used.Is the statement 'this statement is false' true or false?
The statement is false.
Reasoning:
If the statement is assumed to be true, then it is false.
If the statement is assumed to be false, then it is false.Is the statement 'this statement is false' true or false?
Yes,
It is either true or false.
both true in the essence that it's false
It can be both.
Yes.
true
depends on how u look at it
Obama, Pelosi, Reid = the trifecta of all that is wrong with Democrats, true or false?
If you list them as Reid - Pelosi - Obama, you can make the acromyn RePO.
They're going to get the Federal gov't so far into debt that the whole USA will get repo'd.
Major trifecta of overspending.
ACORN registers those votes that they buy with new welfare programs.
We pay.
Everybody lives like poor people except for them.Obama, Pelosi, Reid = the trifecta of all that is wrong with Democrats, true or false?
True
We are headed for a Great Demorcrat Depression if Barack Hussein Obama is elected, God forbid, and implenents his Socialist TAX TAX TAX.
The United Socialist States of America aka USSA.
Karl Marx believed that socialism represents the transition between capitalism and communism.
Obama, Pelosi, Reid = the trifecta of all that is wrong with Democrats, true or false?
Other than the fact that a getting the trifecta is usually a good thing, that is a true statement.
Seems like a recipe for disaster.
As a horseman, I enjoy betting on the tri fectas, but in the case of this tri fecta, we all lose
There are no democrats
only Republicans in denial
True!! These socialists will ruin America if they get more power. The dems have been running congress for the last two years and they have a lower approval rating than the president who they insist on bashing.
Oh how very true and WAY to scary to think about. Then you have to ask this as Halloween is coming up Scares the pee out of me.
McCain/Palin '08
rw
A match made in he//
Absolutely true.
true, true, true.
let's not forget Barney Fwank, Dodd et al
True...but then I think about Waxman, Murtha, Frank, and Spector....perhaps false.
BINGO !
True.
True
True
True...in fact I would call their acts treason.
OH YES, NO TRUER WORDS HAVE BEEN TYPED!!!
true
true but theres more
The truth will set us free!
Pelosi and Reid, agreed.
Obama no way.
The problem is the repugs don't get it.
67% of the population feel the country is headed in the wrong direction.
A good portion of republican representatives will be run out of office next week.
It is predicted the Dem's will pick up seats in the senate, they could in fact have a veto proof congress.
Pay attention. It is the repugs that have been wrong
I don't believe you republicans are trying to use this as a reason to vote for McCain.
This is like saying...we know McCain is a horrible choice for president....but we can't let dems have all 3...so PLEASSSSSSSEEEEEE????Cats
They're going to get the Federal gov't so far into debt that the whole USA will get repo'd.
Major trifecta of overspending.
ACORN registers those votes that they buy with new welfare programs.
We pay.
Everybody lives like poor people except for them.Obama, Pelosi, Reid = the trifecta of all that is wrong with Democrats, true or false?
True
We are headed for a Great Demorcrat Depression if Barack Hussein Obama is elected, God forbid, and implenents his Socialist TAX TAX TAX.
The United Socialist States of America aka USSA.
Karl Marx believed that socialism represents the transition between capitalism and communism.
Obama, Pelosi, Reid = the trifecta of all that is wrong with Democrats, true or false?
Other than the fact that a getting the trifecta is usually a good thing, that is a true statement.
Seems like a recipe for disaster.
As a horseman, I enjoy betting on the tri fectas, but in the case of this tri fecta, we all lose
There are no democrats
only Republicans in denial
True!! These socialists will ruin America if they get more power. The dems have been running congress for the last two years and they have a lower approval rating than the president who they insist on bashing.
Oh how very true and WAY to scary to think about. Then you have to ask this as Halloween is coming up Scares the pee out of me.
McCain/Palin '08
rw
A match made in he//
Absolutely true.
true, true, true.
let's not forget Barney Fwank, Dodd et al
True...but then I think about Waxman, Murtha, Frank, and Spector....perhaps false.
BINGO !
True.
True
True
True...in fact I would call their acts treason.
OH YES, NO TRUER WORDS HAVE BEEN TYPED!!!
true
true but theres more
The truth will set us free!
Pelosi and Reid, agreed.
Obama no way.
The problem is the repugs don't get it.
67% of the population feel the country is headed in the wrong direction.
A good portion of republican representatives will be run out of office next week.
It is predicted the Dem's will pick up seats in the senate, they could in fact have a veto proof congress.
Pay attention. It is the repugs that have been wrong
I don't believe you republicans are trying to use this as a reason to vote for McCain.
This is like saying...we know McCain is a horrible choice for president....but we can't let dems have all 3...so PLEASSSSSSSEEEEEE????
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)