I said noooo noooo nooooTrue or False: A link is a pointer to a document somewhere on the Web?
it's false because the link can be a picture witch is not a document
and the file can be on your computer witch is not the web
A link is a pointer on a fileTrue or False: A link is a pointer to a document somewhere on the Web?
technically this is false
Friday, February 12, 2010
(5x+2)+0=5x+2 is it true or false and what property?
?(5x+2)+0=5x+2 is it true or false and what property?
it is called the zero property, or Identity Property...and yes that is true
The Zero property means that adding 0 to any number leaves you with the number. (ex: 0 + 5 = 5)
Also, the problem with the other answer: Associative property has nothing to do with adding 0, it means that if you reverse the order of added numbers, you get the same answer...so 3+5 is the same as 5+3, which has nothing to do with what you're asking :o)(5x+2)+0=5x+2 is it true or false and what property?
It is true. It is called the additive identity, or identitive property of addition, which says that if you add zero to any quantity, the sum will be the original quantity itself. 鈾?br>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_id鈥?/a>
I think it's the associative property (it states that it doesn't matter which numbers associate with each other)
True. Associative.
true, additive identity property
it is called the zero property, or Identity Property...and yes that is true
The Zero property means that adding 0 to any number leaves you with the number. (ex: 0 + 5 = 5)
Also, the problem with the other answer: Associative property has nothing to do with adding 0, it means that if you reverse the order of added numbers, you get the same answer...so 3+5 is the same as 5+3, which has nothing to do with what you're asking :o)(5x+2)+0=5x+2 is it true or false and what property?
It is true. It is called the additive identity, or identitive property of addition, which says that if you add zero to any quantity, the sum will be the original quantity itself. 鈾?br>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_id鈥?/a>
I think it's the associative property (it states that it doesn't matter which numbers associate with each other)
True. Associative.
true, additive identity property
True or False: Beverly Hills Cop 1,2,3 was the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER?
Killer soundtrack, Killer Action scenes, Killer Dialogue. AND it was profoundly meaningful. What more could you ask for?.
Professional opinions only please.True or False: Beverly Hills Cop 1,2,3 was the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER?
False, Any movie that starts off with Debbie Does and has squeals is the greatest Trilogy Ever.True or False: Beverly Hills Cop 1,2,3 was the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER?
false
False. I liked them but there's others I prefer, the Matrix, Star Wars, or Terminator trilogies are superior
oh yes it was great do you know I just rewatched 3 this past week end...love the shows all of them
you aint gonna shoot me, i can see it in your eyes
you got lyin eyes!!
Well, I doubt my opinion counts as ';professional'; but I wouldn't call it the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER.
false
i love beverley hills cop trilogy, but in opinion the star wars trilogy was the best trilogy ever.Cats
Professional opinions only please.True or False: Beverly Hills Cop 1,2,3 was the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER?
False, Any movie that starts off with Debbie Does and has squeals is the greatest Trilogy Ever.True or False: Beverly Hills Cop 1,2,3 was the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER?
false
False. I liked them but there's others I prefer, the Matrix, Star Wars, or Terminator trilogies are superior
oh yes it was great do you know I just rewatched 3 this past week end...love the shows all of them
you aint gonna shoot me, i can see it in your eyes
you got lyin eyes!!
Well, I doubt my opinion counts as ';professional'; but I wouldn't call it the GREATEST movie trilogy EVER.
false
i love beverley hills cop trilogy, but in opinion the star wars trilogy was the best trilogy ever.
True or False. Similar figures have the same shape and angle measyres but not necessarily the same length side?
TrueTrue or False. Similar figures have the same shape and angle measyres but not necessarily the same length side?
True. That's what it means to be ';Similar';.
True. That's what it means to be ';Similar';.
TRUE OR FALSE: in the 1780s, states had their own constitutions, many with their own bill of rights?
yes and they still do today.TRUE OR FALSE: in the 1780s, states had their own constitutions, many with their own bill of rights?
False. The United States were formed in 1776 This instilled a unionized group of laws superseding States Rights four years before your date.
False. The United States were formed in 1776 This instilled a unionized group of laws superseding States Rights four years before your date.
True Or False?? How can you love somebody when you dont love yourself? explain this one please?
I think it's true. I see people all the time that obviously don't love themselves but are married and seem to be in love.True Or False?? How can you love somebody when you dont love yourself? explain this one please?
You can't.
You must first place a value of worth on oneself to give a value to the love you offer to another.
If one expects to give oneself to another there should always be something there to help build a relatiuonship on.
Worthless is not a credit but actually a debit when it comes to love.True Or False?? How can you love somebody when you dont love yourself? explain this one please?
true... if you cant find something in yourself to love then how can someone else... and if they do how can they stay with you if u dont want urslf does this make sense... it does in my head... i have a record for bad explainations... but i have the explaination
I believe it's false
Because the reason someone wouldn't love themself is because they can't find anything in themself to love, though if they find something in someone else that they love, then they can love that person
Because people are different from each other. Just because you don't love yourself, that doesn't stop you from loving others.
False.
Sometimes, when you don't love yourself, you need someone to love you and point out how amazing you really are.
false you can hate yourself for loving someone else
I have never loved myself. But I am capable of loving others. I always have been. Animals are the easiest to love, tho.
being unable to forgive yourself
True, if you can't love yourself then how in the world can you love anyone else.
False, no one doesn't love him/herself unless he/she has mental disorder...z
False, I LOVE myself, but I hate that dumb b@stard Jon!!
You can't.
You must first place a value of worth on oneself to give a value to the love you offer to another.
If one expects to give oneself to another there should always be something there to help build a relatiuonship on.
Worthless is not a credit but actually a debit when it comes to love.True Or False?? How can you love somebody when you dont love yourself? explain this one please?
true... if you cant find something in yourself to love then how can someone else... and if they do how can they stay with you if u dont want urslf does this make sense... it does in my head... i have a record for bad explainations... but i have the explaination
I believe it's false
Because the reason someone wouldn't love themself is because they can't find anything in themself to love, though if they find something in someone else that they love, then they can love that person
Because people are different from each other. Just because you don't love yourself, that doesn't stop you from loving others.
False.
Sometimes, when you don't love yourself, you need someone to love you and point out how amazing you really are.
false you can hate yourself for loving someone else
I have never loved myself. But I am capable of loving others. I always have been. Animals are the easiest to love, tho.
being unable to forgive yourself
True, if you can't love yourself then how in the world can you love anyone else.
False, no one doesn't love him/herself unless he/she has mental disorder...z
False, I LOVE myself, but I hate that dumb b@stard Jon!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)